Export 334 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
Latu, E., & Chapman, E.. (2002). Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 619-22.
Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C.. (2006). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
He, Q., & Tymms, P.. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.
He, Q., & Tymms, P.. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.
Gierl, M. J., & Zhou, J.. (2008). Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29
PDF icon Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing.pdf (444.58 KB)
Gierl, M. J., & Zhou, J.. (2008). Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29
PDF icon Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing.pdf (444.58 KB)
Gierl, M. J., & Zhou, J.. (2008). Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29
PDF icon Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing.pdf (444.58 KB)
Tonidandel, S. (2002). Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.
Gershon, R. C. (2005). Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 109-27.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
Tang, K. L. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
Meng, H., & Han, C.. (2017). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Patsula, L. N. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
Roper, B. L. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
Imai, S. (2017). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
PDF icon bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)
B
Chang, H. - H. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB)
Chang, H. - H. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB)
Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.
van der Linden, W. J., Jiang, B., Ren, H., Choi, S. W., & Diao, Q.. (2017). Bayesian Perspectives on Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
A
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
Fan, M. (1995). Assessment of scaled score consistency in adaptive testing from a multidimensional item response theory perspective. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 55, 5598.
Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B.. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.

Pages