Title: Biblio RTF Export
Author: Biblio 7.x

Reckase, M. D.  (2024).  The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001

Wise, S. L.  (2023).  Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022

Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J..  (2023).  How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032

DeMars, C. E.  (2022).  The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008

Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S..  (2019).  How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C..  (2019).  Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

Morin, M.  (2017).  Adapting Linear Models for Optimal Test Design to More Complex Test Specifications. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Schouwstra, S.  (2017).  Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Maslak, A., & Pozdniakov, S..  (2017).  Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web

van der Linden, W. J., Jiang, B., Ren, H., Choi, S. W., & Diao, Q..  (2017).  Bayesian Perspectives on Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Imai, S.  (2017).  Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Meng, H., & Han, C..  (2017).  Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Seo, D. Gi.  (2017).  A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing

Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C..  (2017).  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Stillwell, D.  (2017).  Concerto 5 Open Source CAT Platform: From Code to Nodes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=11eu1KKILQEoK5c-CYO1P1AiJgiQxX0E0

Thompson, N.  (2017).  Developing a CAT: An Integrated Perspective. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jv8bpH2zkw5TqSMi03e5JJJ98QtXf-Cv

Liang, C., Wang, D., Zhou, D., & Zhan, P..  (2017).  The Development of a Web-Based CAT in China. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Han, S. - Y., & Yoo, Y. Joo.  (2017).  Efficiency of Item Selection in CD-CAT Based on Conjunctive Bayesian Network Modeling Hierarchical attributes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RbO2gd4aULqsSgRi_VZudNN_edX82NeD

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U..  (2017).  Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Thompson, N., & Stoeger, J..  (2017).  Evaluation of Parameter Recovery, Drift, and DIF with CAT Data. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F7HCZWD28Q97sCKFIJB0Yps0H66NPeKq

Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T..  (2017).  From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ

Reckase, M. D.  (2017).  How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu

Chen, T., Huang, C. - Y., & Liu, C..  (2017).  An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh

Gershon, R. C.  (2017).  Issues in Trait Range Coverage for Patient Reported Outcome Measure CATs - Extending the Ceiling for Above-average Physical Functioning. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZC02F-dIyYovEjzpeuRdoXDiXMLFRuKb

Reckase, M. D., He, W., Xu, J. - R., & Zhou, X..  (2017).  Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs

Shi, Y.  (2017).  Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Chandra, I.  (2017).  Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

Bulut, O., & Cormier, D..  (2017).  A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M..  (2017).  Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for  Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al..  (2017).  New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa

Kuo, B. - C., & Chen, C. - H..  (2017).  A New Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Simultaneously Diagnosing Skills and Misconceptions. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T..  (2017).  New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Shi, Y.  (2017).  Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2

Choe, E., Williams, B., & Lee, S. - H..  (2017).  Scripted On-the-fly Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wKuAstITLXo6BM4APf2mPsth1BymNl-y

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. Y..  (2017).  Using Bayesian Decision Theory in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Shen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L..  (2017).  Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students? Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Barnard, J. J.  (2015).  Implementing a CAT:  The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

Belov, D. I.  (2014).  Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D..  (2013).  The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2?14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000

Schwall, A., & Sinar, E..  (2011).  Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: bUnique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Chang, H. - H.  (2011).  Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G..  (2011).  catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Kingsbury, G. G.  (2011).  Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C..  (2011).  Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Wise, S. L.  (2011).  From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Chien, Y., Shin, D., & Way, W. D..  (2011).  A Heuristic Of CAT Item Selection Procedure For Testlets. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Krishnan, E.  (2011).  High-throughput Health Status Measurement using CAT in the Era of Personal Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B..  (2011).  Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Bontempo, B. D.  (2011).  Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Verschoor, A.  (2011).  Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Zara, A.  (2011).  A Paradigm for Multinational Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J..  (2011).  Practitioner?s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Judd, W.  (2011).  Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Verschoor, A., Radtke, I., & Eggen, T..  (2011).  A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Finkelman, M..  (2011).  The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Gialluca, K. A.  (2011).  Walking the Tightrope: Using Better Content Control to Improve CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Veldkamp, B. P.  (2010).  Bayesian item selection in constrained adaptive testing. Psicologica, 31, 149-169.

Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., Veldkamp, B. P., Schakel, L., & Smid, N. G..  (2010).  Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.

Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al..  (2010).  Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33, 781-92. presented at the Jun 1.

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G..  (2010).  Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Anatchkova, M. D., Saris-Baglama, R. N., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B..  (2009).  Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.

Kocalevent, R. D., Rose, M., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., et al..  (2009).  An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al..  (2009).  Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Jette, A. M., Tao, W., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Ludlow, L. H..  (2009).  Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A..  (2008).  Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.

Gierl, M. J., & Zhou, J..  (2008).  Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29

Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al..  (2008).  Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275-283. presented at the Feb.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2008).  Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S..  (2008).  The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Allen, D. D., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M..  (2008).  Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L..  (2008).  ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.

Cook, K. F., Choi, S. W., Crane, P. K., Deyo, R. A., Johnson, K. L., & Amtmann, D..  (2008).  Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.

Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R..  (2008).  Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J..  (2008).  Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2008).  Some new developments in adaptive testing technology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 3-11.

Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Thompson, N. A., & Ro, S..  (2007).  Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C..  (2007).  Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

Chakravarty, E. F., Bjorner, J. B., & Fries, J. F..  (2007).  Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al..  (2007).  The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V..  (2007).  Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Chang, C. - H.  (2007).  Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.

Thompson, N. A.  (2007).  A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al..  (2007).  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Rubio, V. J., Aguado, D., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M..  (2007).  Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E..  (2007).  Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.

Häusler, J..  (2006).  Adaptive success control in computerized adaptive testing. Psychology Science, 48, 436-450.

Penfield, R. D.  (2006).  Applying Bayesian item selection approaches to adaptive tests using polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 1-20.

van der Linden, W. J., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2006).  Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L..  (2006).  Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D..  (2006).  The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M..  (2006).  Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C..  (2006).  Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al..  (2006).  Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2006).  Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.

Bode, R. K., Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Heinemann, A. W., Shevrin, D., Von Roenn, J., & Cella, D..  (2006).  Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.

Lai, J. - S., Crane, P. K., & Cella, D..  (2006).  Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1179-90. presented at the Sep.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z..  (2006).  [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Barrada, J. R., Mazuela, P., & Olea, J..  (2006).  Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 18, 156-159. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A..  (2006).  Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D..  (2006).  Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J..  (2006).  Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G..  (2006).  SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., Werneke, M. W., & Stratford, P. W..  (2006).  Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947?956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K..  (2006).  Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.

Núñez, R. M. N., & Pina, J. A. L..  (2006).  Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.

Hambleton, R. K.  (2005).  Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In C. C.  Gotay & Snyder, C., Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Haley, S. M., Raczek, A. E., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A..  (2005).  Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.

Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X..  (2005).  A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2005).  A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.

Gershon, R. C.  (2005).  Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 109-27.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D..  (2005).  A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

He, Q., & Tymms, P..  (2005).  A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W..  (2005).  Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Cook, K. F., O'Malley, K. J., & Roddey, T. S..  (2005).  Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D..  (2005).  Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Reeve, B. B., Von Roenn, J., Shervin, D., McGuire, M., et al..  (2005).  An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.

Siebens, H., Andres, P. L., Pengsheng, N., Coster, W. J., & Haley, S. M..  (2005).  Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D..  (2005).  The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M..  (2005).  Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2005).  A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.

Paek, P.  (2005).  Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G..  (2005).  Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J..  (2005).  Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al..  (2004).  Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Ray, R. D.  (2004).  Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W.  Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S. L..  (2004).  Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.

Andres, P. L., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M..  (2004).  Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.

Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E..  (2004).  Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 13-23.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J..  (2004).  Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A..  (2004).  Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2004).  Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2004).  Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Lilley, M., Barker, T., & Britton, C..  (2004).  The development and evaluation of a software prototype for computer-adaptive testing. Computers and Education, 43, 109-123.

Chen, S. - Y., & Ankenmann, R. D..  (2004).  Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.

Laurier, M.  (2004).  Évaluation et multimédia dans l'apprentissage d'une L2 [Assessment and multimedia in learning an L2]. ReCALL, 16, 475-487.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A..  (2004).  Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A..  (2004).  An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.

Frey, A., & Moosbrugger, H..  (2004).  Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.

Taherbhai, H. M., & Young, M. J..  (2004).  Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.

Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A..  (2004).  Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.

Davis, L. L.  (2004).  Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.

Meijer, R. R.  (2004).  Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T..  (2003).  Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.

McLeod, L., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D..  (2003).  A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J..  (2003).  Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N..  (2003).  A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2003).  Computerized adaptive testing with item cloning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 247-261.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J..  (2003).  The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T..  (2003).  Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G..  (2003).  Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.

Veldkamp, B. P.  (2003).  Item selection in polytomous CAT. In A.  Okada, Shigenasu, K., Kano, Y., & Meulman, J., New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207?214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J..  (2003).  Optimal stratification of item pools in ?-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A..  (2003).  The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

van der Linden, W. J.  (2003).  Some alternatives to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 249-265.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S..  (2003).  Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A..  (2003).  Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K..  (2002).  Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.

Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B..  (2002).  Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H..  (2002).  A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Tonidandel, S.  (2002).  Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.

Latu, E., & Chapman, E..  (2002).  Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 619-22.

Ban, J. - C., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J..  (2002).  Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.

Rizavi, S. M.  (2002).  The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.

Stark, S., & Drasgow, F..  (2002).  An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (2002).  An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F..  (2002).  Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

Embretson, S. E.  (2002).  Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P.  Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J..  (2002).  Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.

Grodenchik, D. J.  (2002).  The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.

Balajthy, E.  (2002).  Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Segall, D. O.  (2002).  An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A..  (2002).  Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Cella, D., & Nowinski, C. J..  (2002).  Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S10-7. presented at the Dec.

Gardner, W., Kelleher, K. J., & Pajer, K. A..  (2002).  Multidimensional adaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care. Medical Care, 40, 812-23. presented at the Sep.

Meijer, R. R.  (2002).  Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M..  (2002).  A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Drasgow, F.  (2002).  The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P.  Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cowan, P., & Morrison, H..  (2001).  Assessment in the twenty-first century: A role of computerised adaptive testing in national curriculum subjects. Teacher Development, 5, 241-57.

Chang, H. - H., Qian, J., & Yang, Z..  (2001).  a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-41.

Roberts, J. S., Lin, Y., & Laughlin, J. E..  (2001).  Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.

Sijtsma, K.  (2001).  Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Pitkin, A. K., & Vispoel, W. P..  (2001).  Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.

Coyle, J.  (2001).  Final answer?. American School Board Journal, 188, 24-26.

Hau, K. - T., & Chang, H. - H..  (2001).  Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.

Tseng, F. - L.  (2001).  Multidimensional adaptive testing using the weighted likelihood estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 4746.

Meijer, R. R., & Grégoire, J..  (2001).  Nouveaux développements dans le domaine du testing informatisé [New developments in the area of computerized testing]. Psychologie Française, 46, 221-230.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E..  (2001).  Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Tejada, R., & Antonio, J..  (2001).  Pasado, presente y futuro de los test adaptativos informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Béjar [Past, present and future of computerized adaptive testing: Interview with Isaac I. Béjar]. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.

Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E..  (2001).  Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J..  (2001).  Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2001).  Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.

Dorronsoro, J. R., Santa-Cruz, C., Rubio Franco, V. J., & Aguado García, D..  (2000).  Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima información para la selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado. Psicothema, 12, 12-14.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W..  (2000).  Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.

Patsula, L. N.  (2000).  A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H..  (2000).  A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Linacre, J. M.  (2000).  Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U.  Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.

Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M..  (2000).  Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 347-64.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.

Strong, S. D.  (2000).  The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.

Schreiber, M. D., Schneider, R. J., Schweizer, A., Beckmann, J. F., & Baltissen, R..  (2000).  Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.

Hambleton, R. K.  (2000).  Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M..  (2000).  Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.

Buck, D. E.  (2000).  An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J..  (2000).  Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive  tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.

Ponsoda, V.  (2000).  Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section. Psicológica, 21, 115-120.

Veerkamp, W. J. J.  (2000).  Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.

McLeod, L. D.  (1999).  Alternative methods for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 3765.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z..  (1999).  a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E..  (1999).  CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bezruczko, N.  (1999).  Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.

Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L..  (1999).  Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-94.

Kalohn, J. C., & Spray, J. A..  (1999).  The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.

Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J..  (1999).  Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.

Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B..  (1999).  Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

van der Linden, W. J.  (1999).  Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.

Buyske, S. G.  (1999).  Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L..  (1999).  Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.

Claudio, M. J. C.  (1998).  Applications of network flows to computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 0855.

Halkitis, P. N.  (1998).  The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. J Outcome Meas, 2, 97-122.

Luecht, R. M., de Champlain, A., & Nungester, R. J..  (1998).  Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.

van der Linden, W. J., & Reese, L. M..  (1998).  A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.

Stocking, M. L., Ward, W. C., & Potenza, M. T..  (1998).  Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.

Chen, S. - K.  (1997).  A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.

Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R..  (1997).  Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Nering, M. L.  (1997).  The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.

Chen, S. - K., Hou, L. Y., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Dodd, B. G..  (1997).  The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.

McBride, J. R.  (1997).  Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In B. K.  Waters & McBride, J. R., Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Stocking, M. L.  (1997).  Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A..  (1997).  Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.

Tang, K. L.  (1996).  A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.

Berg, S. R.  (1996).  Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.

Gershon, R. C.  (1996).  The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.

Forker, J. E., & McDonald, M. E..  (1996).  Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: computer adaptive and computer simulation testing. Nurse Education, 21, 13-4. presented at the Jul-Aug.

Luecht, R. M.  (1996).  Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.

Fan, M.  (1995).  Assessment of scaled score consistency in adaptive testing from a multidimensional item response theory perspective. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 55, 5598.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E..  (1994).  The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.

Kim, H. - O.  (1994).  Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.

Moon, O.  (1993).  An application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Test of English as a Foreign Language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 4257-4258.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L..  (1993).  Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.

Roper, B. L.  (1993).  Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.

Carlson, R. D.  (1993).  Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C..  (1992).  Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.

de la Torre Sanchez, R.  (1992).  The development and evaluation of a system for computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 4304.

Powell, Z. - H. E.  (1992).  Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.

Kuan, T. H.  (1991).  A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.

Chang, S. - H.  (1991).  Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A..  (1991).  Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

de Ayala, R. J., Dodd, B. G., & Koch, W. R..  (1990).  A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.

Reckase, M. D.  (1989).  Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.

Hung, P. - H.  (1989).  Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.

Schoonman, W.  (1989).  An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N..  (1989).  A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.

de Ayala, R. J.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three parameter model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3148.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D..  (1987).  The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

Garrison, W. M., & Baumgarten, B. S..  (1986).  An application of computer adaptive testing with communication handicapped examinees. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 23-35.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (1985).  Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change due to instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3057.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J..  (1984).  Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D..  (1984).  Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Reckase, M. D.  (1983).  A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing  (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Orban, J. A.  (1982).  Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A..  (1972).  Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 85-95.