Export 111 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is P  [Clear All Filters]
2012
Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977
Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304
2011
Zara, A. (2011). A Paradigm for Multinational Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Zara Multinational Adaptive Testing.pdf (175.98 KB)
Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B.. (2011). Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing: Effects of Item Pool Size, Test Termination Criterion, and Number of Cutscores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 1006-1022. doi:10.1177/0013164410393956
Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011Meng Item Drift.pdf (337.44 KB)
2010
Segall, D. O. (2010). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Chen, S. - Y. (2010). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788
2008
Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
Huh, S. (2008). Preparing the implementation of computerized adaptive testing for high-stakes examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.
2007
Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07desmarais.pdf (474.93 KB)
PDF icon cat07immekus.pdf (202.27 KB)
Thompson, N. A. (2007). A Practitioner’s Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.
PDF icon th07-01.pdf (313.27 KB)
Thompson, N. A. (2007). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.
2003
Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, H.. (2003). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ch03-01.pdf (238.7 KB)
Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
Jodoin, M. G. (2003). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.
2001
Raîche, G.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.
Raîche, G, B. J. G., & Boiteau, N.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).
Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Raîche, G.. (2001). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.
2000
Chang, H. - H., Chang, S., & Ansley,. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.
Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Tonidandel, S.,, & Quiñones, M. A.. (2000). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.
1999
Pastor, D. A., Chiang, C., Dodd, B. G., & and Yockey, R.. (1999). Performance of the Sympson-Hetter exposure control algorithm with a polytomous item bank. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
Wang, S., & Wang, T.. (1999). Precision of Warm's weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
PDF icon wa99-02.pdf (603.32 KB)
Davey, T., Pommerich, M., & Thompson, D. T.. (1999). Pretesting alongside an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Miller, T., & Davey, T.. (1999). Principles for administering adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A procedure to compare conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
1998
Lunz, M. E., & Stahl, J. A.. (1998). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.
Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.

Pages