Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1997). Overview of the USMLE Step 2 computerized field test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Pashley, P. (1997). An overview of the LSAC CAT research agenda. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section. Psicológica, 21, 115-120.

Olivier, P. (1973). An overview of tailored testing (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Program of Educational Evaluation and Research Design.

Teresi, J. A. (2006). Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Medical Care, 44, S39-49. presented at the Nov.

Wise, S. L. (1997). Overview of practical issues in a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Eggen, T. (2001). Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Optimum number of strata in the a-stratified adaptive testing design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Chajewski, M., & Lewis, C.. (2009). Optimizing item exposure control algorithms for polytomous computerized adaptive tests with restricted item banks. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (In Press). Optimizing cognitive ability measurement with multidimensional computer adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing.

Cordova, M. J. (1997). Optimization methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A.. (2003). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. Manchester UK.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2004). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Optimal test assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Optimal stratification of item pools in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Vos, H. J. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.

Choi, S. W., Moellering, K. T., Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2016). Optimal Reassembly of Shadow Tests in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 469-485. doi:10.1177/0146621616654597

Yang, L., & Reckase, M. D.. (2020). The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the p-Optimality Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 955-974. doi:10.1177/0013164419901292

Wolfe, J. H. (1981). Optimal item difficulty for the three-parameter normal ogive model. Psychometrika, 46, 461-464.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1996). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.

Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

Wiberg, M. (2003). An optimal design approach to criterion-referenced computerized testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 97-100.

Verschoor, A. (2011). Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Segal, H. (1977). Operational Considerations in Implementing Tailored Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & De Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational Characteristics of Adaptive Testing Procedures Using the Graded Response Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 129-143.

Koch, W. R., & G., D. B.. (1986). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using partial credit scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Patience, W. M.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).

Gorham, W. A. (1976). Opening remarks. In . W. H. Gorham (Chair), Computers and testing: Steps toward the inevitable conquest (PS 76-1). Symposium presented at the 83rd annual convention of the APA, Chicago IL. Washington DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Developement Center.

Liu, S., Cai, Y., & Tu, D.. (2018). On-the-Fly Constraint-Controlled Assembly Methods for Multistage Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 595-613. doi:10.1111/jedm.12194

Zheng, Y., & Chang, H. - H.. (2015). On-the-Fly Assembled Multistage Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 104-118. doi:10.1177/0146621614544519

Bejar, I. I. (1999). On-the-fly adaptive tests: An application of generative modeling to quantitative reasoning. In Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.

Harmes, J. C., Kromrey, J. D., & Parshall, C. G.. (2001). Online item parameter recalibration: Application of missing data treatments to overcome the effects of sparse data conditions in a computerized adaptive version of the MCAT. Unpublished manuscript.

Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2015). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065

Chang, Y. I., & Lu, H. Y.. (2010). Online calibration via variable length computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 75, 140-157.

Guo, F., Stone, E., & Cruz, D.. (2001). On-line Calibration Using PARSCALE Item Specific Prior Method: Changing Test Population and Sample Size. In Paper presented at National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting. Seattle, Washington.

Zheng, Y. (2016). Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 434-450. doi:10.1177/0146621616650406

Guo, F., & Wang, G.. (2003). Online calibration and scale stability of a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2009). Obtaining reliable diagnostic information through constrained CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.