Export 350 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is L  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
Laurier, M. (1990). What can we do with computerized adaptive testing and what we cannot do? . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Regional Language Center Seminar.
U
Lau, C. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Using unidimensional IRT models for dichotomous classification via CAT with multidimensional data. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston MA.
Wei, H., & Lin, J.. (2015). Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.979492
Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian Decision Theory to Design a Computerized Mastery Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 367-386.
PDF icon v14n4p367.pdf (1.29 MB)
Lewis, C.,, & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 367-386.
Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788
Lai, H., Alves, C., & Gierl, M. J.. (2009). Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09lai.pdf (319.89 KB)
Foong, Y. - Y., & Lam, T. - L.. (1991). The use of the graded response model in computerized adaptive testing of the attitudes to science scale. In annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. presented at the April 3-7, 1991, Chicago, IL USA.
Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Finkelman, M.. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB)
Laurier, M. (1993). Un test adaptatif en langue seconde : la perception des apprenants. In . R.Hivon (Éd.),L’évaluation des apprentissages. Sherbrooke : Éditions du CRP.
T
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Trait Parameter Recovery Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in Reading and Mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0146621604270667
Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.
Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227-242.
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 805-813.
Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1990). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.
Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2
Luecht, R. M., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2002). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA examination. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.. New Orleans.
PDF icon lu02-01.pdf (191.34 KB)
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. presented at the Sep.
Laurier, M. (1999). Testing adaptatif et évaluation des processus cognitifs. In . C. Depover and B. Noël (Éds) : L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs - Modèles, pratiques et contextes. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.
Lunz, M. E., Stahl, J. A., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1993). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Luecht, R. M., & Clauser, B. E.. (2002). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In . C. N. Mille,. M. T. Potenza, J. J. Fremer, and W. C. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Luecht, R. M., & Burgin, W. L.. (2003). Test information targeting strategies for adaptive multistage testlet designs. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-03.pdf (178.13 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing, an approximation of stochastic approximation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 707-711.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing: An application of stochastic approximation (RM 71-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
S
Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.
PDF icon lee02-01.pdf (186.93 KB)
Way, W. D., Zara, A., & Leahy, J.. (1996). Strategies for managing item pools to maximize item security. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Lu, Y., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
Zhu, R., Yu, F., & Liu, S. M.. (2002). Statistical indexes for monitoring item behavior under computer adaptive testing environment. In (Original title: Detecting item misfit in computerized adaptive testing.) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon zh02-02.pdf (2.23 MB)
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.
van der Linden, W. J., & Xiong, X.. (2013). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143
Lewis, C. (2007). Some thoughts on controlling item exposure in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07lewis.pdf (356.34 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-02.pdf (165.27 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1980). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
Luecht, R. M. (1995). Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2000). Solving complex constraints in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, USA.
PDF icon le00-02.pdf (347.05 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies Rasch model. In R. D. Bock, New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51-61). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
Linacre, J. M. (1988). Simple and effective algorithms [for] computer-adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1972). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 85-95.
Lord, F. M. (1970). The self-scoring flexilevel test (RB-7043). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Pages