Export 112 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is P  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
Z
Zara, A. (2011). A Paradigm for Multinational Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Zara Multinational Adaptive Testing.pdf (175.98 KB)
W
Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.
Weiss, D. J. (1985). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Weiss, D. J. (1980). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Weiss, D. J. (1978). Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.
Way, W. D. (1997). Protecting the integrity of the CAT item pool. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Waters, C. J. (1964). Preliminary evaluation of simulated branching tests. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office Technical Research Note 140.
Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1995). Precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis.
Wang, T. (1995). The precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City (UM No. 9945102).
Wang, S., & Wang, T.. (1999). Precision of Warm's weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
PDF icon wa99-02.pdf (603.32 KB)
Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
T
Trabin, T. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item response theory models. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.
Tonidandel, S.,, & Quiñones, M. A.. (2000). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.
Thompson, N. A. (2007). A Practitioner’s Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.
PDF icon th07-01.pdf (313.27 KB)
Thompson, N. A. (2007). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.
Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000
S
Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1984). Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Segall, D. O. (1988). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Segall, D. O. (2010). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Bloxom, B. M., & Hetter, R. D.. (1997). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
R
Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
Reckase, M. D. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
PDF icon Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1977). Procedures for computerized testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 70, 351-356.
Reckase, M. D. (1976). Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
Raîche, G, B. J. G., & Boiteau, N.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).
Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ra02-01.pdf (99.92 KB)
Raîche, G.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.
Raîche, G.. (2001). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.
M
Mills, C. N.,, & Stocking, M. L.. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.
Miller, T., & Davey, T.. (1999). Principles for administering adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
Miller, T. R. (1992). Practical considerations for conducting studies of differential item functioning (DIF) in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011Meng Item Drift.pdf (337.44 KB)
McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
McBride, J. R., Wetzel, C. D., & Hetter, R. D.. (1997). Preliminary psychometric research for CAT-ASVAB: Selecting an adaptive testing strategy. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 83-95). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Pages