. (1996). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB). (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
. (2001). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
ch01-02.pdf (694.64 KB). (1996). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential design, and computerized adaptive testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2007). A system for interactive assessment and management in palliative care. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 33, 745-55.
. (2003). Test-score comparability, ability estimation, and item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.
. (2017). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (1995). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.
. (2002). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
ch02-02.pdf (1.09 MB). (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2004). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.
. (2001). Implementing content constraints in a-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach (Research Report 01-001). University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.
. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
ch02-01.pdf (251.46 KB). (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB). (2004). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.
ch04-01.pdf (180.23 KB). (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.
. (2002). Applicable adaptive testing models for school teachers. Educational Media International, 39, 55-59.
. (2017). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (1997). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (2004). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (1995). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (1997). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (2015). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (2010). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788
. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
. (2001). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
ch01-01.pdf (250.96 KB). (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (2004). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2020). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2008). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2009). Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09chen.pdf (307.42 KB). (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2007). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (1997). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (2020). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820
. (2003). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
ch03-01.pdf (238.7 KB). (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2007). The modified maximum global discrimination index method for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07cheng.pdf (171.07 KB). (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing for cognitive diagnosis. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09cheng.pdf (313.85 KB). (2007). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological. Measurement, 3, 467–482.
. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.
. (2006). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.