Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.

Wu, M. - L., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2008). Investigating item exposure control on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 1-32.

Wright, B. D., & Douglas, G. A.. (1975). Best test design and self-tailored testing (Research Memorandum No 19). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education, Statistical Laboratory.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Constrained item selection using a stochastically curtailed SPRT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Computerized classification testing in more than two categories by using stochastic curtailment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wood, R. L. (1973). Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.

Wood, R. L. (1971). Computerized adaptive sequential testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Wood, R. L. (1969). The efficacy of tailored testing. Educational Research, 11, 219-222.

Wood, R. L. (1972). Fully adaptive sequential testing: A Bayesian procedure for efficient ability measurement. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.

Wood, R. (1976). Adaptive testing: A Bayesian procedure for the efficient measurement of ability. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 13(2), 36.

Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Computerized testing technology. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 4, 71-78.

Wolfe, J. H. (1981). Optimal item difficulty for the three-parameter normal ogive model. Psychometrika, 46, 461-464.

Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.

Wise, L. L., Curran, L. T., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). CAT-ASVAB cost and benefit analyses. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1994). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022

Wise, S. L., & G. Kingsbury, G.. (2016). Modeling Student Test-Taking Motivation in the Context of an Adaptive Achievement Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 86–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12102

Wise, S. L., Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2002). Self-adapted testing: An overview. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 12, 107-122.

Wise, S. L. (1997). Overview of practical issues in a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1988). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). An investigation of restricted self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Wise, S. L., Plake, S. S., Johnson, P. L., & Roos, S. L.. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.

Wise, S. L. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001

Wise, S. L., Freeman, S. A., Finney, S. J., Enders, C. K., & Severance, D. D.. (1997). The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,. (1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Wise, S. L. (1996). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094

Wise, S. L. (1999). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wise, S. L., Finney, S. J.,, Enders, C. K., Freeman, S. A., & Severance, D. D.. (1999). Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 185-198.

Wise, S. L. (1995). Item review and answer changing in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Trier, Germany.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S.,, & Nebelsick-Gullett, L. J.. (1994). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.

Wise, S. L. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wingersky, M. S. (1989). A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Williamson, D. M., & Bejar, I. I.. (2002). Using testlet response theory to evaluate the equivalence of automatically generated multiple-choice items. In Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Eucation. New Orleans LA.

Williams, V. S. L. (1999). The development and cognitive evaluation of an audio-assisted computer-adaptive test for eight-grade mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wildgrube, W. (1982). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF): Empirical approaches. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp.353-359). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wildgrube, W. (1980). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 68-77). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborator.

Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.

Wiberg, M. (2006). Sequential Computerized Mastery Tests—Three Simulation Studies. International Journal of Testing, 6, 41-55. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_3

Wiberg, M. (2003). An optimal design approach to criterion-referenced computerized testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 97-100.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1985). Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.

Wendt, A., Kao, S., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Developing item variants: An empirical study. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Optimum number of strata in the a-stratified adaptive testing design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.  . (2001). Adaptation of a-stratified method in variable length computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Welch, R. E.,, & Frick, T.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing in instructional settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 47-62.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Sequential testing for selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 337-351.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Sequential Testing for Selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(3), 337-351.

Weissman, A. (2003). Information theoretic approaches to item selection. In Paper presented at the 13th international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Sardinia, Italy.

Weissman, A. (2002). Assessing the efficiency of item selection in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Weissman, A. (2003). Assessing the efficiency of item selection in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Weissman, A. (2007). Mutual Information Item Selection in Adaptive Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 41-58. doi:10.1177/0013164406288164

Weissman, A. (2006). A Feedback Control Strategy for Enhancing Item Selection Efficiency in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 84-99. doi:10.1177/0146621605282774

Weissman, A. (2004). Mutual information item selection in multiple-category classification CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.