Rulison, K.,, & Loken, E.. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.

Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023

Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023

Rudner, L. M. (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Ying Cheng,. (2010). Improving Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing by Balancing Attribute Coverage: The Modified Maximum Global Discrimination Index Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 902-913. doi:10.1177/0013164410366693

Parshall, C. G., Harmes, J. C., Davey, T., & Pashley, P. J.. (2010). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Zwick, R. (2010). The Investigation of Differential Item Functioning in Adaptive Tests. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 331-352). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Glas, C. A. W. (2010). Item Parameter Estimation and Item Fit Analysis. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 269-288). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J.. (2010). Item Selection and Ability Estimation in Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 3-30). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Hagge, S., Woo, A., & Dickison, P.. (2011). Impact of Item Drift on Candidate Ability Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Lin, C. - J. (2011). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints for Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 20-36. doi:10.1177/0013164410387336

van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B.. (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. L., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2012). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756

Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x

Huebner, A. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).

Ho, T. - H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686

Patton, J. M., Ying Cheng,, Yuan, K. - H., & Diao, Q.. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727

Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038

Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638

Wang, C. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419

He, W., & Reckase, M. D.. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629

van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2014). Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723

Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988

Veldkamp, B. P. (2016). On the Issue of Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Response Times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 212–228. doi:10.1111/jedm.12110

van Boxel, M., & Eggen, T.. (2017). The Implementation of Nationwide High Stakes Computerized (adaptive) Testing in the Netherlands. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Kn1PvgioUYaOJ5pykq-_XWnwDU15rRsf

Chen, T., Huang, C. - Y., & Liu, C.. (2017). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh

Zheng, C., He, G., & Gao, C.. (2017). The Information Product Methods: A Unified Approach to Dual-Purpose Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321 - 324. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617730392

Gershon, R. C. (2017). Issues in Trait Range Coverage for Patient Reported Outcome Measure CATs - Extending the Ceiling for Above-average Physical Functioning. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZC02F-dIyYovEjzpeuRdoXDiXMLFRuKb

Chang, H. - H., & Guo, R.. (2017). Item Parameter Drifting and Online Calibration. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Reckase, M. D., He, W., Xu, J. - R., & Zhou, X.. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs

Shi, Y. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3

Spoden, C., Frey, A., & Bernhardt, R.. (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338

Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634

Tu, D., Han, Y., Cai, Y., & Gao, X.. (2018). Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 677-694. doi:10.1177/0146621618762748

Cetin-Berber, D. Duygu, Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Huggins-Manley, A. Corinne. (2019). Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0013164418805532

Leroux, A. J., J. Waid-Ebbs, K., Wen, P. - S., Helmer, D. A., Graham, D. P., O’Connor, M. K., & Ray, K.. (2019). An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 624-638. doi:10.1177/0146621618824856

Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634

Wang, C., Chen, P., & Jiang, S.. (2020). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241

Chen, C. - W., Wang, W. - C., Chiu, M. Ming, & Ro, S.. (2020). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252

Barnard, J. J. (2022). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001

Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001