Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al.. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33, 781-92. presented at the Jun 1.

Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A.. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

Butcher, J. N., Keller, L. S., & Bacon, S. F.. (1985). Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.

Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Burke, M. J,, Normand, J., & Raju, N. M.. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.

Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement (Research Report 98-35). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1986). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In . In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed and pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.

Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc

Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T.. (2003). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.

Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.

Bryson, R. (1971). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.

Brown, J. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Brossman, B. G., & Guille, R. A.. (2014). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018

Brooks, S. (1977). A comparison of the classification of students by two methods of administration of a mathematics placement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1977.

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

Bringsjord, E. L. (2001). Computerized-adaptive versus paper-and-pencil testing environments: An experimental analysis of examinee experience.

Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., & Hessinger, J.. (2003). Effect of extra time on GRE® Quantitative and Verbal Scores (Research Report 03-13). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing service.

Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2000). Variations in mean response times for questions on the computer-adaptive GRE general test: Implications for fair assessment (GRE Board Professional Report No. 96-20P: Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-7).

Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A.. (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2002). Fairness issues in adaptive tests with strict time limits. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Automated Simultaneous Assembly for Multistage Testing. International Journal of Testing, 5, 319-330. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_8

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B.. (2004). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multi-Stage Testing for the Uniform CPA Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Breithaupt, K., Ariel, A., & Hare, D. R.. (2010). Assembling an Inventory of Multistage Adaptive Testing Systems. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 247-266). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162

Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H.,, & Wang, X.. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets . Psychometrika, 64, 153-168.

Bradlow, E. T., Weiss, R. E., & Cho, M.. (1998). Bayesian identification of outliers in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 910-919.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (2003). A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Boyd, A. M. (2003). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434

Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.

Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.

Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Bowers, D. R. (1992). Computer-based adaptive testing in music research and instruction. Psychomusicology, 10, 49-63.

Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: the Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1, 3, 5.

Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).

Born, S., & Frey, A.. (2017). Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 241-262. doi:10.1177/0013164416643744

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Montowidlo, S. J., Drasgow, F., Foster, L., & Kubisiak, U. C.. (1998). Computerized adaptive rating scales that measure contextual performance. In Paper presented at the 3th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas TX.

Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Kubisiak, U. C., & Buck, D. E.. (2000). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Bontempo, B., Julian, E. R., & Gorham, J. L.. (1997). Assessing speededness in variable-length computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bontempo, B. D. (2011). Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Bode, R. K., Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Heinemann, A. W., Shevrin, D., Von Roenn, J., & Cella, D.. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.

Bode, R. K., Cella, D., Lai, J. S., & Heinemann, A. W.. (2003). Developing an initial physical function item bank from existing sources. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 124-36.

Bock, R. D., & Zimowski, M. F.. (1998). Feasibility studies of two-stage testing in large-scale educational assessment: Implications for NAEP. American Institutes for Research, CA.

Bock, B. D.,, Muraki, E., & Pfeiffenberger, W.. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.

Bock, B. D.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444.

Bock, R. D. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 46-49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bochner, J., Garrison, W., Palmer, L., MacKenzie, D., & Braveman, A.. (1997). A computerized adaptive testing system for speech discrimination measurement: The Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 101, 2289-298.

Bloxom, B. M., & Vale, C. D.. (1987). Multidimensional adaptive testing: A procedure for sequential estimation of the posterior centroid and dispersion of theta. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Montreal, Canada.

Blais, J. G., & Raiche, G.. (2010). Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 424-31.

Blais, J. G. (2002). Historique et concepts propres au testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing: Historical accounts and concepts]. In Presented at the 69th Congress of the Acfas. Sherbrooke: Association canadienne française pour l’avancement des sciences (Acfas). [In French].

Blais, J. - G., & Raiche, G.. (2002). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Blais, J. - G., & Raîche, G.. (2005). Features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In . D. G. Englehard (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice. Volume 6.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.