Armitage, P. (1950). Sequential analysis with more than two alternative hypotheses, and its relation to discriminant function analysis, 12, 137-144.

Anastasi, A. (1953). An empirical study of the applicability of sequential analysis to item selection, 13, 3-13.

Angoff, W. H. Huddleston, E. M. (1958). The multi-level experiment: A study of a two-level test system for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Nisbet, J., Adams, M., & Arthur, J.. (1980). A simple form of tailored testing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 301-303.

Nisbet, J., Adams, M., & Arthur, J.. (1980). A simple form of tailored testing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 301-303.

Trollip, S. R., & Anderson, R. I.. (1982). An adaptive Private Pilot Certification Exam. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.

Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, G. F.. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allred, L. A., & Green, B. F.. (1984). Analysis of experimental CAT ASVAB data. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

Millman, J., & Arter, J. A.. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 315-330.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (1984). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System. St. Paul MN: Author.

Adams, R. J. (1987). Adaptive testing, information, and the partial credit model. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Center for the Study of Higher Education.

Ackerman, T. A. (1987). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (1988). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul MN: Author.

Auger, R. (1989). Étude de praticabilité du testing adaptatif de maîtrise des apprentissages scolaires au Québec : une expérimentation en éducation économique secondaire 5. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. [In French].

Adema, J. J. (1990). The construction of customized two-staged tests, 27, 241-253.

Ackerman, T. A. (1991). The use of unidimensional parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 13-24.

Ackerman, T. A. (1991). The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 13-24.

Auger, R. (1992). Le testing adaptatif avec interprétation critérielle, une expérience de praticabilité du TAM pour l’évaluation sommative des apprentissages au Québec.. (S. P. Seguin)Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 15-1 et 2.

Styles, I., & Andrich, D.. (1993). Linking the standard and advanced forms of the Ravens Progressive Matrices in both the paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive-testing formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 905-925.

Arrowwood, V. E. (1994). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Lau, C. - M. A.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: UIRT versus MIRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

American-Council-on-Education.,. (1995). Guidelines for computer-adaptive test development and use in education. Washington DC: Author.

Andrich, D. (1995). Review of the book Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Psychometrika, 4?, 615-620.

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation.,. (1996). Users manual for the MicroCAT testing system, Version 3.5. St Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Lau, C. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Using unidimensional IRT models for dichotomous classification via CAT with multidimensional data. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston MA.

Spray, J. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Huang, C. - Y., & Lau, C. A.. (1997). Unidimensional approximations for a computerized adaptive test when the item pool and latent space are multidimensional (Research Report 97-5). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Berliner, N.. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Way, W. D., Steffen, M., & Anderson, G. S.. (1998). Developing, maintaining, and renewing the item inventory to support computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the colloquium. Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments, Philadelphia PA.

Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing (ACT Research Report series 99-5). Iowa City IA: ACT, Inc.

Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.

Anderson, D. (1999). Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Dorronsoro, J. R., Santa-Cruz, C., Rubio Franco, V. J., & Aguado García, D.. (2000). Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima información para la selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado. Psicothema, 12, 12-14.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.

Chang, H. - H., Chang, S., & Ansley,. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.

Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximenez, M. C., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.

Abdullah, S. C., & Cooley, R. E.. (2000). Using constraints to develop and deliver adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Computer-Assisted Testing Conference.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E.. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Walker, C. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Ackerman, T. A.. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (2001). The FastTEST Professional Testing System, Version 1.6 [Computer software]. St. Paul MN: Author.

Tejada, R., & Antonio, J.. (2001). Pasado, presente y futuro de los test adaptativos informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Béjar [Past, present and future of computerized adaptive testing: Interview with Isaac I. Béjar]. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J.. (2001). Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Tonidandel, S., Quiñones, M. A., & Adams, A. A.. (2002). Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers’ reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 320-332.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J. J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L.. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.