Export 346 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is L  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
A
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). Accuracy of reading and mathematics ability estimates under the shadow-test constraint MCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
Li, Y. H., & Yu, N. Y.. (2002). Accuracy of the ability estimate and the item exposure rate under multidimensional adaptive testing with item constraints. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Dowling, C. E., Hockemeyer, C., & Ludwig, A. H.. (1996). Adaptive assessment and training using the neighbourhood of knowledge states. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montral, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 578-587.
Luecht, R. M. (2009). Adaptive computer-based tasks under an assessment engineering paradigm. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09luecht.pdf (288.75 KB)
Lamboudis, D., Economides, A. A., & Papastergiou, A.. (2003). Adaptive exploration of assessment results under uncertainty. In . Proceedings 3rd IEEE ternational Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT '03, 460-461, 2003.
Lamboudis, D., & Economides, A. A.. (2004). Adaptive exploration of user knowledge in computer based testing. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 3 (1), 322-327.
Yan, D., Lewis, C., & Stocking, M.. (2004). Adaptive Testing With Regression Trees in the Presence of Multidimensionality. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 293-316. doi:10.3102/10769986029003293
Yan, D., Lewis, C., & Stocking, M.. (1998). Adaptive testing without IRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Karino, C. A., Costa, D. R., & Laros, J. A.. (2009). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09karino.pdf (159.63 KB)
Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.
Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ar03-02.pdf (417.41 KB)
B
McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1998). A Bayesian approach to detection of item preknowledge in a CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Smith, R. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). A Bayesian computerized mastery model with multiple cut scores. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Lord, F. M. (1976). A broad range tailored test of verbal ability. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 75-78). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-01.pdf (249.89 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1975). A broad range test of verbal ability (RB-75-5). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
PDF icon lo75-01.pdf (249.89 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1977). A broad-range tailored test of verbal ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 95-100.
Lord, F. M. (1977). A Broad-Range Tailored Test of Verbal Ability . Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 95-100.
PDF icon v01n1p095.pdf (402.88 KB)
C
Luecht, R. M. (1998). CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.
Lau, C. A., & Wang, T.. (1998). Comparing and combining dichotomous and polytomous items with SPRT procedure in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
PDF icon la98-01.pdf (374.46 KB)
Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Comparing three item selection approaches for computerized adaptive testing with content balancing requirement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon le02-01.pdf (225.92 KB)
Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J.. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
Lewis, M. J., Subhiyah, R. G., & Morrison, C. A.. (1995). A comparison of classification agreement between adaptive and full-length test under the 1-PL and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Smith, R. L., & Lewis, C.. (2002). A comparison of computer mastery models when pool characteristics vary. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon sm02-01.pdf (691.36 KB)
Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2018). A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187
Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2018). A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187
Leroux, A. J., Lopez, M., Hembry, I., & Dodd, B. G.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
Leroux, A. J., Lopez, M., Hembry, I., & Dodd, B. G.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
Lee, H. Y., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296
Way, W. D., Lewis, C., & Smith, R. L.. (1995). A comparison of two IRT-based models for computerized mastery testing when item parameter estimates are uncertain. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.
Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing. International journal of Educational Research, 6, 623-634.
Levitt, H. (1980). Computer applications in audiology and rehabilitation of the hearing impaired. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 471-481.
Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Linacre, J. M. (1987). A computer program for adaptive testing by microcomputer (MESA Memorandum No 40). Chicago: University of Chicago. (ERIC ED 280 895.).
Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (2000). Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Luecht, R. M. (2004). Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. MESA Memorandum No 9. Chicago : MESA psychometric laboratory, Unversity of Chicago.
Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C.. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C.. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
Luecht, R. M. (1998). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 , 224-236.

Pages