Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Mooney, J. A.. (1989). Trace lines for testlets: A use of multiple-categorical-response models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 247-260.

Veldkamp, B. P., Matteucci, M., & de Jong, M. G.. (2013). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2011). Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.

Millman, J. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests: An alternate point of view. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 20-21.

Meijer, R. R. (2004). Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

McBride, J. R. (1976). Adaptive mental testing: The state of the art (Technical Report 423). Washington DC: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

McBride, J. R. (1979). Adaptive mental testing: The state of the art (Technical Report 423). Alexandria VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

McBride, J. R. (1979). Adaptive tests' usefulness for military personnel screening. In M. Wiskoff, Chair, Military Applications of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Symposium presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York.

Mendez, F. A. (2001). Application of data mining to response data in a computerized adaptive test. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle WA.

Prestwood, J. S., Vale, C. D., Massey, R. H., & Welsh, J. R.. (1985). Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery: Development of an adaptive item pool (AFHLR-TR-85-19; Technical Rep No 85-19). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 83-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R.. (1997). CAST 5 for Windows users' guide. Contract No. "MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R.. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

McBride, J. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing project: Objectives and requirements (Tech Note 82-22). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 447).

McBride, J. R. (1982). Computerized Adaptive Testing system development and project management. Minutes of the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) Steering Committee. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics), Accession Policy Directorate.

McBride, J. R. (1979). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art (ARI Technical Report 423). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., Brown, M., & Lillig, C.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. (ERIC No. ED414536).

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (1998). Does adaptive testing violate local independence? (Research Report 98-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mazzeo, J., & Harvey, A. L.. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.

Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.

McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Maurelli, V. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R.. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mislevy, R. J., & Wu, P. - K.. (1996). Missing responses and IRT ability estimation: Omits, choice, time limits, and adaptive testing (Research Report RR-96-30-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R.. (1997). Modification of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) for use by recruiters in all military services. Final Technical Report FR-WATSD-97-24, Contract No. MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., Reynolds, T. J., & McCormick, D. J.. (1976). Monte carlo results from a computer program for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 2). Los Angeles CA: University of California, Department of Psychology.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Mills, C. N., & Stocking, M. L.. (1995). Practical issues in large-scale high-stakes computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-23). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Hogan, P. F., Dall, T., & McBride, J. R.. (1996). Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative ASVAB testing concepts at MET sites. Interim report to Defense Manpower Data Center. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI, Inc.

Moreira Junior, F. J., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). Proposta para a construo de um Teste Adaptativo Informatizado baseado na Teoria da Resposta ao Item (Proposal for the construction of a Computerized Adaptive Testing based on the Item Response Theory). Poster session presented at the Congresso Brasileiro de Teoria da Resposta ao Item, Florianpolis SC Brazil.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1988). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1988). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, D. C., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, D. C., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

McBride, J. R., Martin, J. T., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory.

McBride, J. R., Martin, J. T., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory.

Martin, J. T., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Martin, J. T., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

McBride, J. R. (1976). Research on adaptive testing 1973-1976: A review of the literature. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.

van der Linden, W. J., & Mead, A. D.. (2003). A sequential Bayes procedure for item calibration in multi-stage testing. Manuscript in preparation.

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Simulating the null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests (Research Report 98-02). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

McBride, J. R., Paddock, A. F., Wise, L. L., Strickland, W. J., & Waters, B. K.. (2001). Testing via the Internet: A literature review and analysis of issues for Department of Defense Internet testing of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) in high schools (FR-01-12). Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Bennett, R. E., Morley, M., & Quardt, D.. (1998). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests (Research Report 98-45). Princeton NJ : Educational Testing Service.