Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
Wang, W. - C., & Chen, B. - H.. (2001). Measurement efficiency of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.
PDF icon wa01-06.pdf (2.29 MB)
Wandall, J. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
Walter, O. B. (2010). Adaptive Tests for Measuring Anxiety and Depression. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 123-136). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Walter, O. B., & Holling, H.. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
PDF icon Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB)
Waller, N. G. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
Wainer, H.,, Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z.. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.
Wainer, H.,. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
Wainer, H.,. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
Wainer, H.,, & Eignor, D. R.. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wagner, M. E. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
V
Vos, H. J. (2001). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential testing problems in psychodiagnostics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 139-159.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. E. W.. (2001). Multidimensional IRT-based adaptive sequential mastery testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Vos, H. J. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.
Vos, H. J. (2000). A minimax solution for sequential classification problems. In . H. A. L. Kiers, J.-P.Rasson, P. J. F. Groenen, and M. Schader (Eds.), Data analysis, classification, and related methods (pp. 121-126). Berlin: Springer. .
Vos, H. J. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Vos, H. J. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.
Vos, H. J. (1997). Applications of Bayesian decision theory to sequential mastery testing (Research Report 97-06). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
Vos, H. J. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A., Bleiler, T., Widiatmo, H., Shrairi, S., & Ihrig, D.. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Vispoel, W. P. (1990). Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.
Vispoel, W., Forte, E., & Boo, J.. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., De la Torre, R., Bleiler, T., & Dings, J.. (1992). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Vispoel, W. P., Coffman, D., & Scriven, D.. (1990). MusicCAT: An adaptive testing program to assess musical ability. In Paper presented at the ADCIS 32nd International Conference. San Diego CA.

Pages