Kuan, T. H. (1991). A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Reeve, B. B., Von Roenn, J., Shervin, D., McGuire, M., et al.. (2005). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.

Latu, E., & Chapman, E.. (2002). Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 619-22.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

Lilley, M., Barker, T., & Britton, C.. (2004). The development and evaluation of a software prototype for computer-adaptive testing. Computers and Education, 43, 109-123.

Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.

Luecht, R. M. (1996). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.

Luecht, R. M., de Champlain, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.

McBride, J. R. (1997). Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In B. K. Waters & McBride, J. R., Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

McLeod, L. D. (1999). Alternative methods for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 3765.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L.. (1999). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-94.

Moon, O. (1993). An application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Test of English as a Foreign Language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 4257-4258.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1984). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.

Orban, J. A. (1982). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E.. (2007). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Patsula, L. N. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z.. (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Powell, Z. - H. E. (1992). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.

Rizavi, S. M. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Roper, B. L. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.

Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Schoonman, W. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Segall, D. O. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

Stocking, M. L. (1997). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.

Stocking, M. L., Ward, W. C., & Potenza, M. T.. (1998). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.

Tang, K. L. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.

Tejada, R., & Antonio, J.. (2001). Pasado, presente y futuro de los test adaptativos informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Béjar [Past, present and future of computerized adaptive testing: Interview with Isaac I. Béjar]. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.

Thompson, N. A., & Ro, S.. (2007). Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Tonidandel, S. (2002). Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.

Tseng, F. - L. (2001). Multidimensional adaptive testing using the weighted likelihood estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 4746.

van der Linden, W. J. (1999). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.

van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.

van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Some new developments in adaptive testing technology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 3-11.

van der Linden, W. J., Ariel, A., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2006). Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.

van der Linden, W. J., & Reese, L. M.. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

Veerkamp, W. J. J. (2000). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2010). Bayesian item selection in constrained adaptive testing. Psicologica, 31, 149-169.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2003). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In A. Okada, Shigenasu, K., Kano, Y., & Meulman, J., New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., Werneke, M. W., & Stratford, P. W.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008