Export 333 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C  [Clear All Filters]
2001
Coyle, J. (2001). Final answer?. American School Board Journal, 188, 24-26.
Tseng, F. - L. (2001). Multidimensional adaptive testing using the weighted likelihood estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 4746.
Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.
Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2000
Patsula, L. N. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.
Strong, S. D. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
Veerkamp, W. J. J. (2000). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
1999
McLeod, L. D. (1999). Alternative methods for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 3765.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.
Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L.. (1999). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-94.
Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.
Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B.. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van der Linden, W. J. (1999). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.
Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.
1997
Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
McBride, J. R. (1997). Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In B. K. Waters & McBride, J. R., Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
1996
Tang, K. L. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.

Pages