Export 339 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C  [Clear All Filters]
Journal Article
Strong, S. D. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.
Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.
Gershon, R. C. (1996). The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
Rizavi, S. M. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
Coyle, J. (2001). Final answer?. American School Board Journal, 188, 24-26.
Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.
Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S.. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J.. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
PDF icon ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB)
Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
Grodenchik, D. J. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
Segall, D. O. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.

Pages