Export 333 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C [Clear All Filters]
. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.
. (2011). A Heuristic Of CAT Item Selection Procedure For Testlets. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
IACAT 2011 Item Selection Chien Shin Way.pdf (209.21 KB). (2011). High-throughput Health Status Measurement using CAT in the Era of Personal Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
IACAT 2011 Health Care Krishnan.pdf (2.84 MB). (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (2002). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.
. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.
ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB). (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
. (2007). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.
. (2017). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2003). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.
. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.
. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.
. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
ji04-01.pdf (648.87 KB). (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
ji04-01.pdf (648.87 KB). (2017). Issues in Trait Range Coverage for Patient Reported Outcome Measure CATs - Extending the Ceiling for Above-average Physical Functioning. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZC02F-dIyYovEjzpeuRdoXDiXMLFRuKb
. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.
. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2005). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.
. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2003). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In , New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.
ve03027.pdf (78.48 KB). (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 van Groen Eggen Veldkamp Item Selection.pdf (593.82 KB). (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q
. (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc
. (2017). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022
. (2008). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.
. (2008). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.
. (2000). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.
. (1998). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.
. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
. (2006). Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 18, 156-159. presented at the Feb.
ba06157.pdf (56.69 KB). (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.
. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.
. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.
. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.
. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.
. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.
. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2002). Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S10-7. presented at the Dec.
. (1996). Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: computer adaptive and computer simulation testing. Nurse Education, 21, 13-4. presented at the Jul-Aug.
. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.
ba07014.pdf (398.44 KB). (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.