Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
T
McHorney, C. A. (2003). Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 403-409. presented at the Sep 2.
Olson, A. (2002). Technology solutions for testing. School Administrator, 4, 20-23.
McBride, J. R. (1997). Technical perspective. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 29-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Veerkamp, W. J. J. (2000). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
Killcross, M. C. (1974). A tailored testing system for selection and allocation in the British Army. In Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Montreal Canada.
Kalisch, S. J. (1974). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.
Croll, P. R., & Urry, V. W.. (1975). Tailored testing: Maximizing validity and utility for job selection. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Toronto. Canada.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing, an approximation of stochastic approximation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 707-711.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing: An application of stochastic approximation (RM 71-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 181-196.
Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A spectacular success for latent trait theory (TS 77-2). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
McCormick, D., & Cliff, N. A.. (1977). TAILOR-APL: An interactive computer program for individual tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 771-774.
Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., & Kehoe, J.. (1977). TAILOR: A FORTRAN procedure for interactive tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 767-769.
S
Wagner, M. E. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., & Hogarty, K. Y.. (2000). Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.
Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.
Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J.. (2004). A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ar04-01.pdf (287.44 KB)
Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). A study of computer-administered stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va75-04.pdf (2.62 MB)
Johnson, M. J. (1979). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ko77116.pdf (684.63 KB)
Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Cudeck, R. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.
Yang, J., Chang, H. - H., Tao, J., & Shi, N.. (2020). Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 346-361. doi:10.1177/0146621619893783
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
Shiba, S., Noguchi, H., & Haebra, T.. (1978). A stratified adaptive test of verbal ability. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 229-238.
Weiss, D. J. (1983). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Weiss, D. J. (1973). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we73-3.pdf (2.44 MB)
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.
PDF icon lee02-01.pdf (186.93 KB)
Vale, C. D. (1975). Strategies of branching through an item pool. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 1-16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va75-01.pdf (599.81 KB)
Weiss, D. J. (1974). Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we74-05.pdf (5.42 MB)
Way, W. D., Zara, A., & Leahy, J.. (1996). Strategies for managing item pools to maximize item security. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
Boyd, A. M. (2003). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
PDF icon bo-03-01_0.pdf (484.09 KB)
Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.
PDF icon bo-03-01.pdf (484.09 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
PDF icon da02-01.pdf (1.79 MB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon da03-01.pdf (619.88 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.

Pages