Export 2294 results:
Miscellaneous
Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).
Stocking, M. L. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
Reckase, M. D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
Legg, S. M., & Buhr, D. C.. (1987). Final report: Feasibility study of a computerized test administration of the CLAST. University of Florida: Institute for Student Assessment and Evaluation.
Weiss, D. J. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Weiss, D. J. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Bejar, I. I. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
PDF icon be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB)
Maurelli, V. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB)
Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Bayroff, A. G., & Seeley, L. C.. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).
Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.
Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.
McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon be73-04.pdf (2.45 MB)
Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon la74-03.pdf (2.97 MB)
Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon la75-01.pdf (1.73 MB)
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Loyd, B. H. (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
Jiao, H., & Lau, A. C.. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
PDF icon ji03-01.pdf (431.5 KB)
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB)
PDF icon br03-01.pdf (87.76 KB)

Pages