Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., Veldkamp, B. P., Schakel, L., & Smid, N. G.. (2010). Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2002). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive tests with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 164-180.

Davey, T., Godwin, J.,, & Mittelholz, D.. (1997). Developing and scoring an innovative computerized writing assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 21-41.

Mills, C. N. (1999). Development and introduction of a computer adaptive Graduate Record Examination General Test. In . F. Drasgow and J .B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 117-135). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al.. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33, 781-92. presented at the Jun 1.

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Pilkonis, P. A., Frank, E., Moore, T., Kim, J. B., & Kupfer, D. J.. (2012). Development of a computerized adaptive test for depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(11), 1105-1112. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.14

McBride, J. R. (1982). Development of a computerized adaptive testing system for enlisted personnel selection. In Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC.

McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1992). The development of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., et al.. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.

McBride, J. R. (2002). The Development of STAR Early Literacy. In Presentation to the 32rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. Desert Springs CA.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In . F. Drasgow and J. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). Does adaptive testing violate local independence?. Psychometrika, 65, 149-156.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (1998). Does adaptive testing violate local independence? (Research Report 98-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

McBride, J. R. (1994). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.

Mattson, J. D. (1983). Effects of item parameter error and other factors on trait estimation in latent trait based adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Frey, A., Hartig, J., & Moosbrugger, H.. (2009). Effekte des adaptiven Testens auf die Moti¬vation zur Testbearbeitung [Effects of adaptive testing on test taking motivation].. Diagnostica, 55, 20-28.

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U.. (2017). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Moser, U.. (2019). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs Under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 121-146. doi:10.1111/jedm.12203

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1977). An empirical evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

McBride, J. R. (1995). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco. CA.

McBride, J. R., Corpe, V. A., & Wing, H.. (1987). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.

Mazzeo, J., & Harvey, A. L.. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.

Bennett, R. E., Steffen, M., Singley, M. K., Morley, M., & Jacquemin, D.. (1997). Evaluating an automatically scorable, open-ended response type for measuring mathematical reasoning in computer-adaptive tests.

Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.

McBride, J. R., & Hogan, P. F.. (1992). Evaluation of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.

Cliff, N. A., & McCormick, D.. (1979). Evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing with simulation data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 495-514.

Cliff, N., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D. J.. (1979). Evaluation of Implied Orders as a Basis for Tailored Testing with Simulation Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(4), 495-514.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

Maurelli, V. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R.,, Morley, M. E.,, Wagner, M. E.,, Bennett R. E.,, & Revuelta, J.. (2003). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2 (3).

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.

Mills, C. N., & Steffen, M.. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 75-99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Muckle, T. J., Bergstrom, B. A., Becker, K., & Stahl, J. A.. (2008). Impact of altering randomization intervals on precision of measurement and item exposure. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(2), 160-167.

McKillip, R. H. (1977). Implementation of Tailored Testing at the Civil Service Commission. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Cudeck, R., McCormick, D., & Cliff, N. A.. (1980). Implied orders tailored testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 157-163.

Cudeck, R., McCormick, D. J., & Cliff, N.. (1980). Implied Orders Tailored Testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4(2), 157-163.

Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. L., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2012). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756

Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. L., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2012). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756

Kim, J., & McLean, J. E.. (1995). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

McBride, J. R. (1998). Innovations in computer-based ability testing: Promise, problems and perils. In . In Hakel, M.D. (Ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Alternatives to traditional testing for selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R.. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mead, A. D. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1

Cook, K. F., Teal, C. R., Bjorner, J. B., Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Crane, P. K., et al.. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.

Millman, J., & Arter, J. A.. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 315-330.

Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B.. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In J. R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Morrison, C., Subhiyah, R,, & Nungester, R.. (1995). Item exposure rates for unconstrained and content-balanced computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Hetter, D. H.. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.