Export 152 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is M [Clear All Filters]
Scoring adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 17-25. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1975). mcb75-01.pdf (441.88 KB)The design of a computerized adaptive testing system for administering the ASVAB. In Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
. (1984). Innovations in computer-based ability testing: Promise, problems and perils. In . In Hakel, M.D. (Ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Alternatives to traditional testing for selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1998). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.
. (1994). Computerized Adaptive Testing system development and project management. Minutes of the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) Steering Committee. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics), Accession Policy Directorate.
. (1982). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 121-140.
. (1977). Simulation studies of adaptive testing: A comparative evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
. (1976). Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In , Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). . (1984).
The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests (College Board Report No. 88-8). New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
. (1988). Measuring change conventionally and adaptively. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 882-897.
. (1998). A comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood scoring in a simulated stradaptive test. Unpublished Masters thesis, St. Mary’s University of Texas, San Antonio TX.
. (1978). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1981). ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB)Effects of item parameter error and other factors on trait estimation in latent trait based adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
. (1983). Comparing methods to recalibrate drifting items in computerized adaptive testing. In American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
. (2009). Recalibrating Drifting Items in CAT MS.docx (543.3 KB)Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web
. (2017). Policy and program management perspective. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters, and J.R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). ma83-01.pdf (2.72 MB)Swedish Enlistment Battery: Construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT-SEB. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 107-114.
. (1998). The Application of the Monte Carlo Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 482-496. doi:10.1177/0146621613486015
. (2013). Application of Dimension Reduction to CAT Item Selection Under the Bifactor Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 419-434. doi:10.1177/0146621618813086
. (2019). Optimizing cognitive ability measurement with multidimensional computer adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing.
. (In Press). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
. (2012). Guido Makransky Dissertation.pdf (2.72 MB)An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09makransky.pdf (364.64 KB)The Applicability of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Ability Measurement in Organizational Assessment. International Journal of Testing, 13, 123-139. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.672352
. (2013). An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 11.
. (2010). The applicability of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing to cognitive ability measurement in organizational assessment. International Journal of Testing, 13(2), 123-139. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.672352
. (2013). Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.
. (2011). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756
. (2012). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (2011). . (1992).
Computer-adaptive test for measuring personality factors using item response theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 999.
. (2003).