Export 339 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C [Clear All Filters]
Multidimensional adaptive testing using the weighted likelihood estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 4746.
. (2001). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.
. (1999). . (2006).
. (2008). Some New Developments in Adaptive Testing.pdf (544.66 KB)
Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.
. (2006). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.
. (2000). . (1998).
Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.
. (1999). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.
. (2003). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.
. (2004). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
. (2000). . (2010).
Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.
. (2007). ba07014.pdf (398.44 KB)An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
. (2004). ji04-01.pdf (648.87 KB)Item selection in polytomous CAT. In , New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.
. (2003). ve03027.pdf (78.48 KB)catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (2011). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2010). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017
. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.
. (2006). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
. (2019). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
. (2022). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
. (2023). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (2019). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022
. (2017). Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: computer adaptive and computer simulation testing. Nurse Education, 21, 13-4. presented at the Jul-Aug.
. (1996). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.
. (2009). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.
. (2007). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.
. (2005). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In , Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
. (2004). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.
. (2008). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.
. (2005). . (1998).
Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
. (2002). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.
. (2006). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (2011). . (2005).
. (2002).
Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.
. (2002). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.
. (2001). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2000). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.
. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
. (2003). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.
. (2002). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.
. (2003). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In , Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (2002). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
. (2006). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2004). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.
. (2000). Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In , Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. (2005). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2001).