Export 149 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is V [Clear All Filters]
Empirical initialization of the trait estimator in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21-29.
. (1999). Item Selection and Ability Estimation in Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 3-30). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Assembling a computerized adaptive testing item pool as a set of linear tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 81-99.
. (2006). Bayesian Perspectives on Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Bayesian item selection in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 343-355.
. (2001). Alpha-stratified adaptive testing with large numbers of content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107-120.
. (2003). . (1998).
Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion (Research Report 97-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1997). The shadow-test approach: A universal framework for implementing adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07vanderlinden.pdf (460.57 KB) cat07vanderlinden.pdf (460.57 KB)Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723
. (2014). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Classifying Examinees With Within-Dimensionality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 387-404. doi:10.1177/0146621616648931
. (2016). A comparison of adaptive self-referenced testing and classical approaches to the measurement of individual change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
. (1996). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.
. (1997). Statistical methods for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing (Research Rep 94-6). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1994). A simple and fast item selection procedure for adaptive testing. Research (Report 94-13). University of Twente.
. (1994). Detection of known items in adaptive testing with a statistical quality control method. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 373-389.
. (2000). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
. (2000). Robust Automated Test Assembly for Testlet-Based Tests: An Illustration with Analytical Reasoning Items. Frontiers in Education, 2, 63. doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00063
. (2017). Robust_ATA_veldkamp_paap_2017.pdf (184.33 KB)Modifications of the branch-and-bound algorithm for application in constrained adaptive testing (Research Report 00-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 149–162). Dendrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (2000). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825
. (2013). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In . H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigemasu, Y Kano, and J. J. Meulman (eds.), New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207-214). Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag.
. (2003). Implementing an alternative to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). . (2010).
Implementing Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in a Shadow-Test Approach to Constrained Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 8, 272-289. doi:10.1080/15305050802262233
. (2008). Multidimensional adaptive testing with constraints on test content (Research Report 00-11). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In , New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.
. (2003). ve03027.pdf (78.48 KB)A multiple objective test assembly approach for exposure control problems in computerized adaptive testing (No. 2007-1). Measurement and Research Department Reports. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
. (2007). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 99-03 ). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1999). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
. (2002). On the Issue of Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Response Times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 212–228. doi:10.1111/jedm.12110
. (2016). Implementing constrained CAT with shadow tests for large item pools. Submitted for publication.
. (2001). Designing Item Pools for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 231-245). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). . (2002).
Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 458-467.
. (2008). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 83-90.
. (1999). MATHCAT: A Flexible Testing System in Mathematics Education for Adults. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 137-150). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Verschoor Radtke Eggen Test Assmebly Model.pdf (339.24 KB)Grow a Tiger out of Your CAT . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Verschoor Optimal Calibration Designs.pdf (164.38 KB)An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1984). Using Determinantal Point Processes for Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GkJkKTEFWK3srDX8TL4ra_Xbsliemu1R
. (2017). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.
. (1994). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
. (1987). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test of tonal memory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 111-136.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1997). Effects of answer feedback and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.
. (1992). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779-788.
. (1993). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (1999). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (1997). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1992).