Bjorner, J. B. (2004). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.

Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. - H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B.. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95-108.

Binet, A., & Simon, T. A.. (1905). Mthode nouvelle pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L'Anne Psychologique, 11, 191-244.

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1915). A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children. Chicago: Chicago Medical Book Co.

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1908). Le development de lintelligence chez les enfants. LAnee Psychologique, 14, 1-94.

Bill, B. C. (1984). A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Bickel, P., Buyske, S., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability. Psychometrika, 66, 69-77.

Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.

Betz, N. E., & Turner, B. M.. (2011). Using Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing in Online Career Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 274-286. doi:10.1177/1069072710395534

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of Immediate Knowledge of Results and Adaptive Testing on Ability Test Performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 259-266.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 259-266.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination. AANA.J, 64, 119-124.

Bergstrom, B. B., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computerized adaptive testing exploring examinee response time using hierarchical linear modeling. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for the national certification examination.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.

Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computerized adaptive testing for licensure and certification. CLEAR Exam Review, Winter 1994, 25-27.

Bergstrom, B. A. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Stahl, J. A.. (1992). Assessing existing item bank depth for computer adaptive testing. In ERIC Document No. TM022404.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.

Bergstrom, B. (1992). Computer adaptive versus paper-and-pencil tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Berger, M. P. F. (1994). A general approach to algorithmic design of fixed-form tests, adaptive tests, and testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 141-153.

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Moser, U.. (2019). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs Under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 121-146. doi:10.1111/jedm.12203

Berger, M. P. F.,, & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U.. (2017). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Berger, M. P. F. (1994). A General Approach to Algorithmic Design of Fixed-Form Tests, Adaptive Tests, and Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(2), 141-153.

Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.

Bennett, R. E., Morley, M., & Quardt, D.. (1998). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests (Research Report 98-45). Princeton NJ : Educational Testing Service.

Bennett, R. E., Steffen, M., Singley, M. K., Morley, M., & Jacquemin, D.. (1997). Evaluating an automatically scorable, open-ended response type for measuring mathematical reasoning in computer-adaptive tests.

Bengs, D., Brefeld, U., & Kröhne, U.. (2018). Adaptive Item Selection Under Matroid Constraints. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(2), 15-36. doi:10.7333/1808-0602015

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Roper, B. L., & Butcher, J. N.. (1990). An empirical study of the computer adaptive MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on recent developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1989). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Roper, B. L.. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration. In Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and inverse problems of item pool design for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547.

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach for Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Belov, D.I., A. R. D. (2008). A Monte Carlo approach to the design, assembly, and evaluation of multistage adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119–137.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach to the Design, Assembly, and Evaluation of Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119-137. doi:10.1177/0146621606297308

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A monte carlo approach for adaptive testing with content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2005). Monte Carlo Test Assembly for Item Pool Analysis and Extension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 239-261. doi:10.1177/0146621605275413

Belov, D. I. (2014). Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

Bejar, I. I. (1977). Applications of adaptive testing in measuring achievement and performance. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. .

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Gialluca, K. A.. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I. (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. In . L. E. Mancall and P. G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alternative methods (pp. 115-130. Evanston IL: The American Board of Medical Specialities.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.