Svetina, D., Liaw, Y. - L., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D.. (2019). Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206

Swanson, D. B., Featherman, C. M., Case, A. M., Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R.. (1997). Relationship of response latency to test design, examinee ability, and item difficulty in computer-based test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I.. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Thissen, D. (1990). Reliability and measurement precision. In . H. Wainer, N. J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B. F. Green, R. J. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, and D. Thissen (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 161-186). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Veldkamp, B. P., & Paap, M. C. S.. (2017). Robust Automated Test Assembly for Testlet-Based Tests: An Illustration with Analytical Reasoning Items. Frontiers in Education, 2, 63. doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00063

Vispoel, W. P. (1998). Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-345.

Wainer, H.,. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.

Wang, T., Hanson, B. H., & Lau, C. - M. H.. (1999). Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Huebner, A.. (2011). Restrictive Stochastic Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 255–273. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00145.x

Wang, S., & Wang, T.. (2002). Relative precision of ability estimation in polytomous CAT: A comparison under the generalized partial credit model and graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Ware, J. E., J., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M.. (2000). Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38, 73-82.

Way, W. D., Swanson, L., Steffen, M., & Stocking, M. L.. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation (Research Report 01-18). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Way, W. D., Swanson, l,, & Stocking, M.. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Weiss, D. J., & Suhadolnik, D.. (1982). Robustness of adaptive testing to multidimensionality. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. {PDF file, 1.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1985). Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S.,, & Nebelsick-Gullett, L. J.. (1994). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.

Wise, S. L. (1999). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1988). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Wood, R. L. (1973). Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.

Ying, Z., & Chang, H. - H.. (1995). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential designs, and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Eleventh Workshop on Item Response Theory. University of Twente, the Netherlands.

Zara, A. (1989). A research proposal for field testing CAT for nursing licensure examinations. In . Delegate Assembly Book of Reports 1989. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Zara, A. (1990). A research proposal for field testing CAT for nursing licensure examinations. In . Delegate Assembly Book of Reports 1989. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing.

Zhao, J. C., McMorris, R. F., Pruzek, R. M., & Chen, R.. (2002). The robustness of the unidimensional 3PL IRT model when applied to two-dimensional data in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Zhao, J. C. (1999). The robustness of the unidimensional 3PL IRT model when applied to two-dimensional data in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.