Export 227 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is I [Clear All Filters]
. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
. (1992). Incorporating post-administration item response revision into a CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.
. (2002). Incorporating the Sympson-Hetter exposure control method into the a-stratified method with content blocking. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
yi02-01.pdf (386.73 KB). (2003). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.
. (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326
. (2003). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT’s item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
li03-02.pdf (417.96 KB). (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1991). Individual differences in computer adaptive testing: Anxiety, computer literacy, and satisfaction. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1993). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1989). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.
. (1969). Individualized assessment of differential abilities. In Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
. (1974). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1971). Individualized testing by Bayesian estimation. Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing Project 0171-177.
. (1995). Individualized testing in the classroom. In . Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science 295-299.
. (1980). Individualized testing on the basis of the Rasch model. In . In J. Th. Van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak, and D. N. M. de Gruijter (Eds.). Psychometrics for educational debates. New York: Wiley.
. (1970). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.
. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
. (1995). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727
. (2001). The influence of item characteristics and administration position on CAT Scores. In Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Hudson Valley, NY, October 26, 2001.
. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
be77-07.pdf (1.97 MB). (2017). The Information Product Methods: A Unified Approach to Dual-Purpose Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321 - 324. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617730392
. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
. (2003). Information theoretic approaches to item selection. In Paper presented at the 13th international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Sardinia, Italy.
. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.
. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.
. (1998). Innovations in computer-based ability testing: Promise, problems and perils. In . In Hakel, M.D. (Ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Alternatives to traditional testing for selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (2002). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).
. (2010). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2000). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.
. (2001). Integrating stratification and information approaches for multiple constrained CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
le01-02.pdf (321.58 KB). (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
. (1974). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.
. (1973). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1989). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.
. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (1985). Introduction. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1993). Introduction of a computer adaptive GRE General test (Research Report 93-57). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). Introduction to item response theory and computerized adaptive testing as applied in licensure and certification testing. National Clearinghouse of Examination Information Newsletter, 6, 11-17.
. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1
. (2007). Investigating CAT designs to achieve comparability with a paper test. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07tthompson.pdf (140.23 KB). (2008). Investigating item exposure control on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 1-32.
. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
. (2004). Investigating the effects of selected multi-stage test design alternatives on credentialing outcomes. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
ze04-01.pdf (128.97 KB). (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (2000). An investigation of approaches to computerizing the GRE subject tests (GRE Board Professional Report No 93-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-4). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.