Export 227 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is I  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
H
He, W., & Reckase, M. D.. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B.. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In J. R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
Ho, T. - H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
Holtzman, W. H. (1970). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
Hornke, L. F. (1995). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
Huebner, A. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).
PDF icon v17n12.pdf (296.59 KB)
K
Kim, J., & McLean, J. E.. (1995). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Kim, J. (1993). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Item pool development and maintenance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2007). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07Kingsbury.pdf (160.68 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1996). Item review and adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
PDF icon ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB)
PDF icon v08n2p147.pdf (573.02 KB)
L
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326
Leung, C. - I., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2001). Integrating stratification and information approaches for multiple constrained CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon le01-02.pdf (321.58 KB)
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (1999). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, CA.
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT’s item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon li03-02.pdf (417.96 KB)
Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Lin, C. - J. (2011). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints for Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 20-36. doi:10.1177/0013164410387336
Linacre, J. M. (1995). Individualized testing in the classroom. In . Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science 295-299.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1999). Impact of flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1998). The impact of scoring flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988
Liu, M., Zhu, R., & Guo, F.. (2001). Impact of item location effects on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Lord, F. M. (1974). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
Lord, F. M. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Luecht, R. M. (2000). Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
M
McBride, J. R. (1998). Innovations in computer-based ability testing: Promise, problems and perils. In . In Hakel, M.D. (Ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Alternatives to traditional testing for selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McKillip, R. H. (1977). Implementation of Tailored Testing at the Civil Service Commission. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon mck77231.pdf (227.92 KB)
Mead, A. D. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1
Millman, J., & Arter, J. A.. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 315-330.
Morrison, C., Subhiyah, R,, & Nungester, R.. (1995). Item exposure rates for unconstrained and content-balanced computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
N
Nicewander, W. A. (2003). Issues in maintaining scale consistency for the CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Pages