Thompson, N. A. (2009). Utilizing the generalized likelihood ratio as a termination criterion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504

Velozo, C. A., Wang, Y., Lehman, L. A., & Wang, J. H.. (2008). Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 458-467.

Green, B. F., & Thomas, T. J.. (1990). Utility of predicting starting abilities in sequential computer-based adaptive tests (Research Report 90-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

De Beer, M. (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.

Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1996). Utility of Fisher information, global information and different starting abilities in mini CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001

Raîche, G.. (1994). Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).

Lau, C. A., Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Using unidimensional IRT models for dichotomous classification via CAT with multidimensional data. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston MA.

Williamson, D. M., & Bejar, I. I.. (2002). Using testlet response theory to evaluate the equivalence of automatically generated multiple-choice items. In Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Eucation. New Orleans LA.

Finkelman, M. D. (2008). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.

Hsu, T. C., & Tseng, F. L.. (1995). Using simulation to select an adaptive testing strategy: An item bank evaluation program. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.

Huitzing, H. A. (2004). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1998). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-06). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2000). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-09). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2001). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 5–20.

H., Q., Staniewska, D., Reckase, M., & Woo, A.. (2016). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102

Meijer, R. R. (2004). Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.

Wei, H., & Lin, J.. (2015). Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.979492

Yao, L., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2014). Using Multidimensional CAT to Administer a Short, Yet Precise, Screening Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 614-631. doi:10.1177/0146621614541514

Han, N. (2003). Using moving averages to assess test and item security in computer-based testing (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No 468). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Millman, J. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests: An alternate point of view. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 20-21.

Ward, W. C. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 16-20.

Thompson, D. L. (1986). Using microcomputer-based assessment in career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 23, 50-56.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Betz, N. E., & Turner, B. M.. (2011). Using Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing in Online Career Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 274-286. doi:10.1177/1069072710395534

Flynn, K. E., Dombeck, C. B., DeWitt, E. M., Schulman, K. A., & Weinfurt, K. P.. (2008). Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: investigator perceptions. Clinical Trials, 5, 575-86.

Vie, J. - J. (2017). Using Determinantal Point Processes for Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GkJkKTEFWK3srDX8TL4ra_Xbsliemu1R

Abdullah, S. C., & Cooley, R. E.. (2000). Using constraints to develop and deliver adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Computer-Assisted Testing Conference.

Cory, C. H. (1976). Using computerized tests to add new dimensions to the measurement of abilities which are important for on-job performance: An exploratory study. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 64-74). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al.. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.

Shen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L.. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Millan, E., Trella, M., Perez-de-la-Cruz, J. - L., & Conejo, R.. (2000). Using Bayesian Networks in Computerized Adaptive Tests. In . M. Ortega and J. Bravo (Eds.),Computers and Education in the 21st Century. Kluwer, pp. 217228.

Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian Decision Theory to Design a Computerized Mastery Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 367-386.

Vos, H. J. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.

Lewis, C.,, & Sheehan, K.. (1990). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 367-386.

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. Y.. (2017). Using Bayesian Decision Theory in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788

Lai, H., Alves, C., & Gierl, M. J.. (2009). Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

De Champlain, A. F. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h

Assessment-Systems-Corporation.,. (1996). Users manual for the MicroCAT testing system, Version 3.5. St Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (1988). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul MN: Author.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (1984). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System. St. Paul MN: Author.

Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H.,. (2001). Users guide for SCORIGHT (version 2) : A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H.,. (2001). User's guide for SCORIGHT (version 1): A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ackerman, T. A. (1991). The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 13-24.

Ackerman, T. A. (1991). The use of unidimensional parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 13-24.

Ackerman, T. A. (1987). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.

Samejima, F. (1977). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.

Foong, Y. - Y., & Lam, T. - L.. (1991). The use of the graded response model in computerized adaptive testing of the attitudes to science scale. In annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. presented at the April 3-7, 1991, Chicago, IL USA.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Velozo, C. A., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. - S.. (1999). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 83-90.

Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D.. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2005). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.

Carey, P. A. (1999). The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Finkelman, M.. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.