Export 74 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is U [Clear All Filters]
Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (1984). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (1988). Users manual for the MicroCAT testing system, Version 3.5. St Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
. (1996). Un test adaptatif en langue seconde : la perception des apprenants. In . R.Hivon (Éd.),L’évaluation des apprentissages. Sherbrooke : Éditions du CRP.
. (1993). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.
. (2004). Up-and-down procedures for approximating optimal designs using person-response functions. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07sheng.pdf (1.02 MB)Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat2007debeer.pdf (133.49 KB)Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1982). we82-02.pdf (437.88 KB)Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09lai.pdf (319.89 KB)Using Bayesian Networks in Computerized Adaptive Tests. In . M. Ortega and J. Bravo (Eds.),Computers and Education in the 21st Century. Kluwer, pp. 217228.
. (2000). Using computerized tests to add new dimensions to the measurement of abilities which are important for on-job performance: An exploratory study. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 64-74). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). co75-01.pdf (631.79 KB)Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).
. (1994). Utilizing the generalized likelihood ratio as a termination criterion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09thompson.pdf (193.51 KB)Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). sm02-02.pdf (985.84 KB)Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB)The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The use of the graded response model in computerized adaptive testing of the attitudes to science scale. In annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. presented at the April 3-7, 1991, Chicago, IL USA.
. (1991). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
. (2017). Using Bayesian Decision Theory in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Using constraints to develop and deliver adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Computer-Assisted Testing Conference.
. (2000). ab00-01.pdf (45.6 KB)Using Determinantal Point Processes for Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GkJkKTEFWK3srDX8TL4ra_Xbsliemu1R
. (2017). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Using testlet response theory to evaluate the equivalence of automatically generated multiple-choice items. In Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Eucation. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). Using unidimensional IRT models for dichotomous classification via CAT with multidimensional data. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston MA.
. (1996). Utility of Fisher information, global information and different starting abilities in mini CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.
. (2002). Unidimensional and multidimensional models for item response theory. Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. presented at the 06/1982, Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometrics Methods Program.
. (1985). The use of computerized adaptive testing to assess psychopathology using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs. American Evaluation Association. presented at the November, Portland, OR USA: American Evaluation Association .
. (2007). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.
. (1997). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825
. (2013). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
. (1994). Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.
. (2011). Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.
. (1969). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.
. (2010). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 83-90.
. (1999). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.
. (1977). v01n2p233.pdf (893 KB)The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 13-24.
. (1991). v15n1p013.pdf (1.06 MB)The use of unidimensional parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 13-24.
. (1991). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788
. (2018). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.
. (1999). Using Bayesian Decision Theory to Design a Computerized Mastery Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 367-386.
. (1990). v14n4p367.pdf (1.29 MB)Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 367-386.
. (1990). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: investigator perceptions. Clinical Trials, 5, 575-86.
. (2008). Using Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing in Online Career Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 274-286. doi:10.1177/1069072710395534
. (2011). Using microcomputer-based assessment in career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 23, 50-56.
. (1986). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 16-20.
. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests: An alternate point of view. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 20-21.
. (1984). Using Multidimensional CAT to Administer a Short, Yet Precise, Screening Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 614-631. doi:10.1177/0146621614541514
. (2014). Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.979492
. (2015). Using patterns of summed scores in paper-and-pencil tests and computer-adaptive tests to detect misfitting item score patterns. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 119-136.
. (2004). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102
. (2016). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 5–20.
. (2008). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.
. (2003). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.
. (1999). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152
. (2004). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.
. (2008).