Han, K. T. (2010). SimulCAT: Windows application that simulates computerized adaptive test administration. Retrieved from http://www.hantest.net/simulcat

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). A study of computer-administered stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1973). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1983). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.

Weiss, D. J. (1974). Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B.. (2005). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Pearson Educational Measurement Research Report 05-01.

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2000). STAR Reading 2 Computer-Adaptive Reading Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2002). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2001). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Wang, T. (1999). Some relationship among issues in CAT item pool management.

McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing (Internal Report). Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners.

Wainer, H.,. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Veerkamp, W. J., & Berger, M. P. F.. (1994). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing (Research Rep 94-6). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED391814). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Research Report 88-33-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Luecht, R. M. (1995). Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.

Way, W. D. (1994). A simulation study of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure for detecting DIF with the NCLEX using CAT (Technical Report xx-xx). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). A simulation study of stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Holland, P. W., & Zwick, R.. (1991). A simulation study of some simple approaches to the study of DIF for CATs. Internal memorandum, Educational Testing Service.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D., & Wingersky, M.. (1993). A simulation study of methods for assessing differential item functioning in computer-adaptive tests (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-11). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Stocking, M. L., Ward, W. C., & Potenza, M. T.. (1997). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 97-10). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Simulating the null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests (Research Report 98-02). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Yi, Q., & Nering, M, L.. (1998). Simulating nonmodel-fitting responses in a CAT Environment (Research Report 98-10). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc. (Also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999: ERIC No. ED 427 042).

Veerkamp, W. J. J. (1994). A simple and fast item selection procedure for adaptive testing. Research (Report 94-13). University of Twente.

Stocking, M. L. (1969). Short tailored tests (RB-69-63). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1970). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. College Entrance Examination Board Research and Development Report (RDR 69-70, No 3", and Educational Testing Service RB-70-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

van der Linden, W. J., & Mead, A. D.. (2003). A sequential Bayes procedure for item calibration in multi-stage testing. Manuscript in preparation.

Lord, F. M. (1970). The self-scoring flexilevel test (RB-7043). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Rijn, P. W. van,, Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2000). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Way, W. D., Gawlick, L. A., & Eignor, D. R.. (2001). Scoring alternatives for incomplete computerized adaptive tests (Research Report 01-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED389710). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Report RR-88-28-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Chang, C. - H., Boni-Saenz, A. A., Durazo-Arvizu, R. A., DesHarnais, S., Lau, D. T., & Emanuel, L. L.. (2007). A system for interactive assessment and management in palliative care. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 33, 745-55.

Mardberg, B., & Carlstedt, B.. (1998). Swedish Enlistment Battery: Construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT-SEB. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 107-114.

Arce-Ferrer, A. J., & Martínez Guzmán, E.. (2009). Studying the Equivalence of Computer-Delivered and Paper-Based Administrations of the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 855-867. doi:10.1177/0013164409332219

Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., Dunlap, I., & et. al.,. (2003). A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 953-961.

Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.

Heift, T., & Schulze, M.. (2003). Student modeling and ab initio language learning. System, 31, 519-535.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M.. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Cudeck, R. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.

Yang, J., Chang, H. - H., Tao, J., & Shi, N.. (2020). Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 346-361. doi:10.1177/0146621619893783

Kalinowski, K. E., Natesan, P., & Henson, R. K.. (2014). Stratified Item Selection and Exposure Control in Unidimensional Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Two-Dimensional Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 563-576. doi:10.1177/0146621614536768

Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x

Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and maximum information item selection procedures in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202-226.

Shiba, S., Noguchi, H., & Haebra, T.. (1978). A stratified adaptive test of verbal ability. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 229-238.

Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). The stratified adaptive ability test as a tool for personnel selection and placement. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 8, 135-151.

Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007

Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133

Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2008). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1-17.

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.

van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Stochastic order in dichotomous item response models for fixed, adaptive, and multidimensional tests. Psychometrika, 63, 211-226.