Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.

McBride, J. R. (1976). Simulation studies of adaptive testing: A comparative evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Veerkamp, W. J. J. (1997). Statistical methods for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, G. F.. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, L. L. (2002). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Boyd, A. M. (2003). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

McBride, J. R. (1975). Scoring adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 17-25. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

van der Linden, W. J. (2010). Sequencing an Adaptive Test Battery. In Elements of Adaptive Testing. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

van der Linden, W. J. (2007). The shadow-test approach: A universal framework for implementing adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies Rasch model. In R. D. Bock, New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51-61). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Reckase, M. D. (1980). Some decision procedures for use with tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 79-100). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Lord, F. M. (1980). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.

Lord, F. M. (1976). Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Lord, F. M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.

Lewis, C. (2007). Some thoughts on controlling item exposure in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2004). State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2007). Statistical aspects of adaptive testing. In . C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 27: Psychometrics) (pp. 801838). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Vale, C. D. (1975). Strategies of branching through an item pool. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 1-16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Hendrickson, A. B., & Kolen, M. J.. (1992). Scaling of two-stage adaptive test configurations for achievement testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Choe, E., Williams, B., & Lee, S. - H.. (2017). Scripted On-the-fly Multistage Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wKuAstITLXo6BM4APf2mPsth1BymNl-y

Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1996). A search procedure to determine sets of decision points when using testlet-based Bayesian sequential testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Reckase, M. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

van der Linden, W. J., & Mead, A. D.. (2004). A sequential Bayesian procedure for item calibration in multistage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Linacre, J. M. (1988). Simple and effective algorithms [for] computer-adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Reshetar, R. A., Norcini, J. J., & Shea, J. A.. (1993). A simulated comparison of testlets and a content balancing procedure for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.

Reshetar, R. A., Norcini, J. J., & Shea, J. A.. (1993). A simulated comparison of two content balancing and maximum information item selection procedures for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.

Nering, M., Thompson, T. D., & Davey, T.. (1997). Simulation of realistic ability vectors. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg TN.

Ross, L. P., Nandakumar, R,, & Clauser, B. E.. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Xu, X., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2003). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Yang, J., Tao, J., Chang, H. - H., & Shi, N. - Z.. (2017). A Simulation Study to Compare Classification Method in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jCL3fPZLgzIdwvEk20D-FliZ15OTUtpr

Judd, W. (2011). Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2000). Solving complex constraints in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, USA.

Samejima, F. (1998). Some considerations for eliminating biases in ability estimation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Samejima, F. (2000). Some considerations for improving accuracy of estimation of item characteristic curves in online calibration of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Some features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Communication proposée au 11e Biannual International objective measurement workshop. New-Orleans : International Objective Measurement Workshops.

Blais, J. - G., & Raiche, G.. (2002). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Singh, J. (1993). Some initial experiments with adaptive survey designs for structured questionnaires. In Paper presented at the New Methods and Applications in Consumer Research Conference. Cambridge MA.

Thissen, D. (1998). Some item response theory to provide scale scores based on linear combinations of testlet scores, for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Segall, D. O., & Davey, T. C.. (1995). Some new methods for content balancing adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1998). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Davey, T., & Fan, M.. (2000). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1999). Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Gushta, M. M. (2003). Standard-setting issues in computerized-adaptive testing. In Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 30th, 2003.

Zhu, R., Yu, F., & Liu, S. M.. (2002). Statistical indexes for monitoring item behavior under computer adaptive testing environment. In (Original title: Detecting item misfit in computerized adaptive testing.) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Way, W. D., Zara, A., & Leahy, J.. (1996). Strategies for managing item pools to maximize item security. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Johnson, M. J. (1979). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.

Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J.. (2004). A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., & Hogarty, K. Y.. (2000). Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Wagner, M. E. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Kosinski, M., & Ni, P.. (2004). Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: Simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 661-6. presented at the Apr.

Rocklin, T. R. (1994). Self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 3-14.

Rocklin, T. R.,, & O’Donnell, A. M.. (1987). Self-adapted testing: A performance improving variation of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315-319.