Export 174 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is S  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
B
Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Berger, M. P. F.,, & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon be74-4.pdf (2.85 MB)
Blais, J. - G., & Raiche, G.. (2002). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.
PDF icon bo-03-01.pdf (484.09 KB)
Boyd, A. M. (2003). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
PDF icon bo-03-01_0.pdf (484.09 KB)
D
Davey, T., & Fan, M.. (2000). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon da03-01.pdf (619.88 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.
PDF icon da02-01.pdf (1.79 MB)
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
F
Feng, X. (2003). Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.
Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.
G
Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2004). State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Gushta, M. M. (2003). Standard-setting issues in computerized-adaptive testing. In Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 30th, 2003.
H
PDF icon ha05629.pdf (227.89 KB)
Hendrickson, A. B., & Kolen, M. J.. (1992). Scaling of two-stage adaptive test configurations for achievement testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Holland, P. W., & Zwick, R.. (1991). A simulation study of some simple approaches to the study of DIF for CATs. Internal memorandum, Educational Testing Service.
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
I
Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
J
Johnson, M. J. (1979). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
Judd, W. (2011). Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT Judd Small-Sample Shadow Testing.pdf (439.46 KB)
K
Kingsbury, G. G. (1999). Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ko77116.pdf (684.63 KB)
Krathwohl, D. R., & Huyser, R. J.. (1956). The sequential item test. American Psychologist, 2, 419.
L
Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.
PDF icon lee02-01.pdf (186.93 KB)
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2000). Solving complex constraints in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, USA.
PDF icon le00-02.pdf (347.05 KB)
Lewis, C. (2007). Some thoughts on controlling item exposure in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07lewis.pdf (356.34 KB)
Linacre, J. M. (1988). Simple and effective algorithms [for] computer-adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Pages