Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977

Lord, F. M. (1978). Panel discussion: Future directions for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Item Response Theory and Computerized adaptive conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Zara, A. (2011). A Paradigm for Multinational Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Johnson, M. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kang, H. - A., & Chang, H. - H.. (2016). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676

Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Tejada, R., & Antonio, J.. (2001). Pasado, presente y futuro de los test adaptativos informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Béjar [Past, present and future of computerized adaptive testing: Interview with Isaac I. Béjar]. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.

Immekus, J. C., Gibbons, R. D., & Rush, J. A.. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and computerized adaptive testing: An application of post-hoc simulation to a diagnostic screening instrument. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chang, C. - H. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R. C., Cook, K. F., Reeve, B., et al.. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Lunz, M. E., & Stahl, J. A.. (1998). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Chang, H. - H., Chang, S., & Ansley,. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.

Pastor, D. A., Chiang, C., Dodd, B. G., & and Yockey, R.. (1999). Performance of the Sympson-Hetter exposure control algorithm with a polytomous item bank. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Trabin, T. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item response theory models. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Personalized feedback in CAT. In . WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, Issue 3, Volume 2,174-181, July 2005.

David, L. A., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000

Eignor, D. R., Folk, V.G.,, Li, M. - Y., & Stocking, M. L.. (1994). Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Green, B. F., Bock, B. D.,, Linn, R. L., Lord, F. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). A plan for scaling the computerized adaptive Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Martin, C. J., & Hoshaw, C. R.. (1997). Policy and program management perspective. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters, and J.R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B.. (2011). Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing: Effects of Item Pool Size, Test Termination Criterion, and Number of Cutscores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 1006-1022. doi:10.1177/0013164410393956

Wang, L. - S., & Li., C. - S.. (2001). Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2 (4).

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2009). a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2).

Killcross, M. C., & Cassie, A.. (1973). The potential use of tailored testing for allocation to army employments. In NATO Conference on Utilisation of Human Resources. presented at the 06/1973, Lisbon, Portugal.

Raîche, G.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.

Raîche, G, B. J. G., & Boiteau, N.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).

Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Miller, T. R. (1992). Practical considerations for conducting studies of differential item functioning (DIF) in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). A practical examination of the use of free-response questions in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Atlanta GA.

Huebner, A., Wang, B., & Lee, S.. (2009). Practical issues concerning the application of the DINA model to CAT data. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Mills, C. N.,, & Stocking, M. L.. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.

Mills, C. N., & Stocking, M. L.. (1995). Practical issues in large-scale high-stakes computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-23). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Holman, R., Glas, C. A., Lindeboom, R., Zwinderman, A. H., & de Haan, R. J.. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.

Lord, F. M. (1974). Practical methods for redesigning a homogeneous test, also for designing a multilevel test (RB-74-30). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A Practitioner’s Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.

Wainer, H.,. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.

Wang, S. (1999). The precision of ability estimation methods for computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1995). Precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis.

Wang, T. (1995). The precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City (UM No. 9945102).

Wang, S.,, & Wang, T.. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.

Wang, S., & Wang, T.. (1999). Precision of Warm's weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.

Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.

Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, H.. (2003). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

Kirisci, L., & Hsu, T. - C.. (1988). A predictive analysis approach to adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

van der Linden, W. J. (2009). Predictive Control of Speededness in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 25-41. doi:10.1177/0146621607314042

Hardwicke, S., & White, K. E.. (1983). Predictive utility evaluation of adaptive testing: Results of the Navy research. Falls Church VA: The Rehab Group Inc.

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1984). Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.

Taherbhai, H. M., & Young, M. J.. (2004). Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.

Hogan, P. F., Dall, T., & McBride, J. R.. (1996). Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative ASVAB testing concepts at MET sites. Interim report to Defense Manpower Data Center. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI, Inc.

Waters, C. J. (1964). Preliminary evaluation of simulated branching tests. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office Technical Research Note 140.