Yi, Q,, & Nering, M.. (1998). Nonmodel-fitting responses and robust ability estimation in a realistic CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.

Weiss, D. J. (1983). New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing. New York: Academic Press.

Wang, L. (2004). New methods for CBT item pool evaluation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al.. (2017). New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa

Wandall, J. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).

von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Thomasson, G. L. (1995). New item exposure control algorithms for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Samejima, F. (2007). Nonparametric online item calibration. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. .

Pommerich, M., Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (2009). The nine lives of CAT-ASVAB: Innovations and revelations. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., Harmes, J. C., & Sentovich, C.. (2001). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.

Meijer, R. R., & Grégoire, J.. (2001). Nouveaux développements dans le domaine du testing informatisé [New developments in the area of computerized testing]. Psychologie Française, 46, 221-230.

McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1998). A new approach for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Lau, C., & Wang, T.. (2000). A new item selection procedure for mixed item type in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

Kuo, B. - C., & Chen, C. - H.. (2017). A New Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Simultaneously Diagnosing Skills and Misconceptions. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). The null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 327-345.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). The null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 327-345.

Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2015). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650

Kandula, S., Ancker, J. S., Kaufman, D. R., Currie, L. M., & Qing, Z. - T.. (2011). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52

Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.

Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME instructional module on multistage testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 44-52.

He, Y., Chen, P., & Li, Y.. (2020). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854

Haynes, B. (1990). National Council Computerized Adaptive Testing Project Review--committee perspective. Issues, 11, 3.

Featherman, C. M., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). New algorithms for item selection and exposure and proficiency estimation under 1- and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008

De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.

de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.

Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G.. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Cronbach, L. J. (1966). New light on test strategy from decision theory. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.). Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.

Cox, M. A. A. (2014). A Numerical Investigation of the Recovery of Point Patterns With Minimal Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 329-335. doi:10.1177/0146621613516186

Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2011). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338

Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2010). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.

Chen, S. - Y. (2001). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2019). Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 543-561. doi:10.1177/0146621618813113

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1997). Nonlinear sequential designs for logistic item response theory models with applications to computerized adaptive tests. The Annals of Statistics.

Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.