Export 37 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is N  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
B
Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.
Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon be75-01.pdf (609.99 KB)
C
Chen, S. - Y. (2001). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon ch01-01.pdf (250.96 KB)
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2011). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2010). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.
Cox, M. A. A. (2014). A Numerical Investigation of the Recovery of Point Patterns With Minimal Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 329-335. doi:10.1177/0146621613516186
Cronbach, L. J. (1966). New light on test strategy from decision theory. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.). Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
D
Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G.. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.
De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.
PDF icon v16n4p327.pdf (1.45 MB)
F
Featherman, C. M., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). New algorithms for item selection and exposure and proficiency estimation under 1- and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
L
Lau, C., & Wang, T.. (2000). A new item selection procedure for mixed item type in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
PDF icon la00-01.pdf (451.53 KB)
N
Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.
P
Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07park.pdf (247.11 KB)
Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., Harmes, J. C., & Sentovich, C.. (2001). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Pommerich, M., Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (2009). The nine lives of CAT-ASVAB: Innovations and revelations. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09pommerich.pdf (168.32 KB)
S
Samejima, F. (2007). Nonparametric online item calibration. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. .
PDF icon cat07samejima.pdf (1.83 MB)
T
Thomasson, G. L. (1995). New item exposure control algorithms for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
V
von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
W
Wandall, J. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al.. (2017). New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa
Wang, L. (2004). New methods for CBT item pool evaluation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon wa04-02.pdf (1004.92 KB)
Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.
Y
Yi, Q,, & Nering, M.. (1998). Nonmodel-fitting responses and robust ability estimation in a realistic CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.