Export 212 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is I  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
I
PDF icon ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2007). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07Kingsbury.pdf (160.68 KB)
Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2002). Identify the lower bounds for item sharing and item pooling in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Yi, Q., Zhang, J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2005). Identifying practical indices for enhancing item pool security. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Montreal, Canada.
Reckase, M. D., Thompson, T. D., & Nering, M.. (1997). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.
Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1990). Illustration of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Boston MA.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1999). Impact of flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Hagge, S., Woo, A., & Dickison, P.. (2011). Impact of Item Drift on Candidate Ability Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Hagge Item Drift.pdf (339.31 KB)
Liu, M., Zhu, R., & Guo, F.. (2001). Impact of item location effects on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Impact of item quality and item bank size on the psychometric quality of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Yi, Q,, & Nering, M.. (1998). The impact of nonmodel-fitting responses in a realistic CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1998). The impact of scoring flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Yi, Q., Widiatmo, H., Ban, J. - C., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). Impact of scoring options for not reached items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon yi01-01.pdf (231.72 KB)
Hambleton, R. K., Jodoin, M., & Zenisky, A. L.. (2002). Impact of selected factors on the psychometric quality of credentialing examinations administered with a sequential testlet design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2001). Impact of several computer-based testing variables on the psychometric properties of credentialing examinations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Impact of test design, item quality and item bank size on the psychometric properties of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
PDF icon xi02-01.pdf (499.56 KB)
Wang, W. - C., & Chen, P. - H.. (2004). Implementation and Measurement Efficiency of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 295-316. doi:10.1177/0146621604265938
Ree, M. J. (1977). Implementation of a Model Adaptive Testing System at an Armed Forces Entrance and Examination Station. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon re77216.pdf (312.3 KB)
McKillip, R. H. (1977). Implementation of Tailored Testing at the Civil Service Commission. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon mck77231.pdf (227.92 KB)
Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2005). An implemented theoretical framework for a common European foreign language adaptive assessment. In . Proceedings ICODL 2005, 3rd ternational Conference on Open and Distance Learning 'Applications of Pedagogy and Technology',339-350,Greek Open University, Patra, Greece.
Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Implementing an alternative to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Yi, Q., Wang, T., & Wang, S.. (2003). Implementing the a-stratified method with b blocking in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon yi03-01.pdf (495.88 KB)
Luecht, R. M. (2000). Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
Rudner, L. M. (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Rudner, L. M. (2007). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test® computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07rudner.pdf (134.53 KB)
Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Grodenchik, D. J. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
PDF icon v04n2p157.pdf (650.25 KB)
Wainer, H.,. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Weiss, D. J. (1995). Improving individual differences measurement with item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. In . D. Lubinski and R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 49-79). Palo Alto CA: Davies-Black Publishing.
Wang, C. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419
Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.
PDF icon v06n4p473.pdf (2.74 MB)
Vispoel, W. P. (1987). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
Vispoel, W. P. (1997). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
Cliff, N. A. (1976). Incomplete orders and computerized testing. In C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 18-23). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon cl75-01.pdf (372.58 KB)
Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
Wang, M., & Wingersky, M.. (1992). Incorporating post-administration item response revision into a CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.

Pages