Export 61 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is F [Clear All Filters]
. (2001). The FastTEST Professional Testing System, Version 1.6 [Computer software]. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (2018). From Simulation to Implementation: Two CAT Case Studies. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 23(14). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=14
. (1964). Feasibility of a programmed testing machine.
. (2008). Functioning and validity of a computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A CAT). Depression and Anxiety, 25, E182-E194.
. (2003). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2 (3).
be03-03.pdf (436.24 KB). (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB). (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. In . L. E. Mancall and P. G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alternative methods (pp. 115-130. Evanston IL: The American Board of Medical Specialities.
. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2003). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.
. (2005). Features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In . D. G. Englehard (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice. Volume 6.
. (2010). Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 424-31.
. (1998). Feasibility studies of two-stage testing in large-scale educational assessment: Implications for NAEP. American Institutes for Research, CA.
. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).
. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: the Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1, 3, 5.
. (2002). Fairness issues in adaptive tests with strict time limits. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
br02-01.pdf (1.26 MB). (1986). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In . In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed and pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.
. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement (Research Report 98-35). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 133-141.
. (2004). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644-645. presented at the Nov 1.
. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644–645.
. (2002). Feasibility and acceptability of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for fatigue monitoring in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 11(7), 134.
. (2002). A further study on adjusting CAT item selection starting point for individual examinees. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1999). Fairness in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2017). FastCAT – Customizing CAT Administration Rules to Increase Response Efficiency. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oPJV-x0p9hRmgJ7t6k-MCC1nAoBSFM1w
. (2020). Framework for Developing Multistage Testing With Intersectional Routing for Short-Length Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 87-102. doi:10.1177/0146621619837226
. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).
. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).
. (1977). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing strategies. In Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing. University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
. (1979). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing. Programmed Larning and Educational Technology, 16, 164-169.
. (2018). Factors Affecting the Classification Accuracy and Average Length of a Variable-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Test. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1802-060101
. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09imai.pdf (654.11 KB). (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ
. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1179-90. presented at the Sep.
. (1987). Final report: Feasibility study of a computerized test administration of the CLAST. University of Florida: Institute for Student Assessment and Evaluation.
. (1999). Formula score and direct optimization algorithms in CAT ASVAB on-line calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the *?*.
. (1998). A framework for exploring and controlling risks associated with test item exposure over time. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1994). A few more issues to consider in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB). (2000). From simulation to application: Examinees react to computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. New Orleans, April 2000.
. (1997). Flawed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 79-96.
. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
. (1980). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.
. (1988). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data: The parameterization of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In Unpublished manuscript.
. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2000). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2011). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.
Thompson-Weissv16n1.pdf (191.79 KB). (1976). A five-year quest: Is computerized adaptive testing feasible?. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 97-102). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
ur75-01.pdf (452.07 KB). (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (2006). A Feedback Control Strategy for Enhancing Item Selection Efficiency in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 84-99. doi:10.1177/0146621605282774
. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Wise From Reliability to Validity.pdf (619.18 KB). (1972). Fully adaptive sequential testing: A Bayesian procedure for efficient ability measurement. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
. (1987). Functional and design specifications for the National Council of State Boards of Nursing adaptive testing system. Unpublished manuscript.