Export 497 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is C [Clear All Filters]
The construction of customized two-staged tests, 27, 241-253.
. (1990). Computerized Adaptive Testing in Early Education: Exploring the Impact of Item Position Effects on Ability Estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 437-451. doi:10.1111/jedm.12215
. (2019). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.
. (2004). Construction of Gratitude Scale Using Polytomous Item Response Theory Model. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pHhO4cq2-wh24ht3nBAoXNHv7234_mjH
. (2017). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.
. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ar03-01.pdf (394.73 KB)Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.
. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.
. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1998). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652
. (2004). Computerized adaptive attitude testing using the partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 55(7-A), 1922 (UMI No. AAM9430378).
. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model for attitude measurement. In . M. Wilson, G. Engelhard Jr and K. Draney (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, volume 4. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
. (1997). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.
. (2001). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
. (1999). Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 21, 313-320. presented at the May.
. (2009). ba09313.pdf (93.66 KB)Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.
. (1960). A comparison of conventional and adaptive achievement testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). be77373.pdf (687.07 KB)Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). be77-05.pdf (1.81 MB)A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1978). be78-04.pdf (1.81 MB)A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.
. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration. In Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.
. (1992). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.
. (1991). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing for licensure and certification. CLEAR Exam Review, Winter 1994, 25-27.
. (1994). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (1991). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1999). . (1996).
Computerized adaptive testing exploring examinee response time using hierarchical linear modeling. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.
. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15(4), 435-464.
. (1992). Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1992). Computer adaptive versus paper-and-pencil tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
. (1992). . (1999).
A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
. (1984). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.
. (2003). bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (2004). bj04-01.pdf (370.36 KB)A computerized adaptive testing system for speech discrimination measurement: The Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 101, 2289-298.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive rating scales that measure contextual performance. In Paper presented at the 3th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas TX.
. (1998). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.
. (2000). . (1992).
A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). bo03-02.pdf (404.34 KB)A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434
. (2013). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). A comparison of the classification of students by two methods of administration of a mathematics placement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1977.
. (1977). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018
. (2014). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.
. (1971). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1, 42-51.
. (1987). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB)Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.
. (2004). Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.
. (1985). Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.
. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.
. (1994). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Considerations in Performance Evaluations of Computerized Formative Assessments. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.
. (1998). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.
. (2003).