Export 122 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is S  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
A
Unick, G. J., Shumway, M., & Hargreaves, W.. (2008). Are we ready for computerized adaptive testing?. Psychiatric Services, 59, 369. presented at the Apr.
Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B.. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
C
PDF icon bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)
PDF icon bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.
D
Belov, D. I. (2014). Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037
Strong, S. D. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.
Wang, J., Weiss, D. J., & Wang, C.. (2017). DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy
E
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

Pages