Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1994). Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.

Bergstrom, B. B., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). Item calibration considerations: A comparison of item calibrations on written and computerized adaptive examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Lunz, M. E., & Stahl, J. A.. (1998). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.

Lunz, M. E., Stahl, J. A., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1993). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1990). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.

Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1991). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing. International journal of Educational Research, 6, 623-634.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1992). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1992). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.

Lunz, M. E., Berstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1992). The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33-40.

Lunz, M. E., & Stone, G. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characterstics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.

O'Neill, T., Lunz, M. E., & Thiede, K.. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.

Lunz, M. E., & Deville, C. W.. (1996). Validity of item selection: A comparison of automated computerized adaptive and manual paper and pencil examinations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 8, 152-157.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.