Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
Wang, L., & Gawlick, L.. (2001). The influence of item characteristics and administration position on CAT Scores. In Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Hudson Valley, NY, October 26, 2001.
Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2014). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057
Wandall, J. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
Walter, O. B., & Holling, H.. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
PDF icon Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB)
Walter, O. B. (2010). Adaptive Tests for Measuring Anxiety and Depression. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 123-136). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Waller, N. G. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.
Wainer, H.,. (1990). Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
Wainer, H.,. (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
Wainer, H.,, & Eignor, D. R.. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
Wainer, H.,, Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z.. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
Wagner, M. E. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
V
Vos, H. J. (2000). A minimax solution for sequential classification problems. In . H. A. L. Kiers, J.-P.Rasson, P. J. F. Groenen, and M. Schader (Eds.), Data analysis, classification, and related methods (pp. 121-126). Berlin: Springer. .
Vos, H. J. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Vos, H. J. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.
Vos, H. J. (1997). Applications of Bayesian decision theory to sequential mastery testing (Research Report 97-06). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
Vos, H. J. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
Vos, H. J. (2001). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential testing problems in psychodiagnostics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 139-159.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. E. W.. (2001). Multidimensional IRT-based adaptive sequential mastery testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Vos, H. J. (1999). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(3), 271–292.
von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., De la Torre, R., Bleiler, T., & Dings, J.. (1992). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Vispoel, W. P., Coffman, D., & Scriven, D.. (1990). MusicCAT: An adaptive testing program to assess musical ability. In Paper presented at the ADCIS 32nd International Conference. San Diego CA.
Vispoel, W. T., & Twing, J. S.. (1990). Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.
Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Vispoel, W. P. (1993). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test of tonal memory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 111-136.
Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Vispoel, W. P.,, & Coffman, D. D.. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.
Vispoel, W. P. (1987). An adaptive test of musical memory: An application of item response theory to the assessment of musical ability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 79A.
Vispoel, W. P. (1999). Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 151-176). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Pages