Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
Miscellaneous
McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon mcb76-02.pdf (1.86 MB)
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Weiss, D. J. (1974). Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we74-05.pdf (5.42 MB)
Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.
PDF icon lee02-01.pdf (186.93 KB)
Weiss, D. J. (1983). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Weiss, D. J. (1973). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we73-3.pdf (2.44 MB)
Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). A study of computer-administered stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va75-04.pdf (2.62 MB)
McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.
Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A spectacular success for latent trait theory (TS 77-2). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing: An application of stochastic approximation (RM 71-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Kalisch, S. J. (1974). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.
PDF icon mcb01-12.pdf (893.86 KB)
de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1977). A two-stage testing procedure (Memorandum 403-77). University of Leyden, The Netherlands, Educational Research Center.
PDF icon wa01-06.pdf (2.29 MB)
van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2000). Using response times to detect aberrant behavior in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-09). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1998). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-06). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki81-03.pdf (1.81 MB)
McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A word knowledge item pool for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-2). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon mcb74-02.pdf (3.78 MB)
Newspaper Article
Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.
Report
Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.
McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.
HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.
Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon gi79-06.pdf (2.72 MB)
Stoloff, P. H. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.
Han, K. T. (2009). Gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing (No. RR-09-07). GMAC Research Reports. McLean, VA. USA: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
Veldkamp, B. P., Verschoor, A. J., & Eggen, T.. (2007). A multiple objective test assembly approach for exposure control problems in computerized adaptive testing (No. 2007-1). Measurement and Research Department Reports. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Pages