Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
S
Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2004). State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2007). Statistical aspects of adaptive testing. In . C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 27: Psychometrics) (pp. 801838). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Feng, X. (2003). Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.
Zhu, R., Yu, F., & Liu, S. M.. (2002). Statistical indexes for monitoring item behavior under computer adaptive testing environment. In (Original title: Detecting item misfit in computerized adaptive testing.) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon zh02-02.pdf (2.23 MB)
Veerkamp, W. J. J. (1997). Statistical methods for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Lu, Y., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon da03-01.pdf (619.88 KB)
PDF icon da02-01.pdf (1.79 MB)
Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.
PDF icon bo-03-01.pdf (484.09 KB)
Boyd, A. M. (2003). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
PDF icon bo-03-01_0.pdf (484.09 KB)
Way, W. D., Zara, A., & Leahy, J.. (1996). Strategies for managing item pools to maximize item security. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
Weiss, D. J. (1974). Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we74-05.pdf (5.42 MB)
Vale, C. D. (1975). Strategies of branching through an item pool. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 1-16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va75-01.pdf (599.81 KB)
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.
PDF icon lee02-01.pdf (186.93 KB)
Weiss, D. J. (1973). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we73-3.pdf (2.44 MB)
Weiss, D. J. (1983). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Shiba, S., Noguchi, H., & Haebra, T.. (1978). A stratified adaptive test of verbal ability. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 229-238.
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
Yang, J., Chang, H. - H., Tao, J., & Shi, N.. (2020). Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 346-361. doi:10.1177/0146621619893783
Cudeck, R. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.
Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ko77116.pdf (684.63 KB)
Johnson, M. J. (1979). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). A study of computer-administered stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va75-04.pdf (2.62 MB)
Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J.. (2004). A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ar04-01.pdf (287.44 KB)
Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.
McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.
Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., & Hogarty, K. Y.. (2000). Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Wagner, M. E. (2001). A system for on-the-fly adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Pages