Bibliography | Page 18 | IACAT

Search

Show only items where

Author

Type

Term

Year

Keyword

Export 2294 results:

Filters: Filter is [Clear All Filters]

Journal Article

Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162

Watts, K.,, Baddeley, A. D., & Williams, M.. (1982). Automated tailored testing using Raven’s Matrices and the Mill Hill vocabulary tests. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 331-344.

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 11.

Elwood, D. L. (1969). Automation of psychological testing. American Psychologist, 24, 287-289.

Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). A â€œRearrangement Procedureâ€ For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262

Moyer, E. L., Galindo, J. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Balancing Flexible Constraints and Measurement Precision in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 629-648. doi:10.1177/0013164411431838

Frick, T. W. (1989). Bayesian adaptation during computer-based tests and computer-guided practice exercises. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 89-114.

Bradlow, E. T., Weiss, R. E., & Cho, M.. (1998). Bayesian identification of outliers in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 910-919.

van der Linden, W. J. (1996). Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 63, 201-216.

van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 63, 201-216.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2010). Bayesian item selection in constrained adaptive testing. Psicologica, 31, 149-169.

McLeod L. D., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D.. (2003). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 2, 121-137.

McLeod, L., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D.. (2003). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.

Culbertson, M. J. (2016). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment: The State of the Field. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 3-21. doi:10.1177/0146621615590401

Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H.,, & Wang, X.. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets . Psychometrika, 64, 153-168.

Owen, R. J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.

Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.

Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian Tailored Testing and the Influence of Item Bank Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 111-120.

v01n1p111.pdf (468.36 KB)

Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 111-120.

Hornke, L. F. (1999). Benefits from computerized adaptive testing as seen in simulation studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 91-98.

Seo, D. Gi, & Weiss, D. J.. (2015). Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 954-978. doi:10.1177/0013164415575147

Weiss, D. J. (2011). Better Data From Better Measurements Using Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, Vol. 2(No. 1), 1-27.

Weiss(2011)_CAT.pdf (417.85 KB)

Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1984). Bias and Information of Bayesian Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(3), 273-285.

v08n3p273.pdf (829.07 KB)

Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1984). Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 273-285.

Lange, R. (2008). Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 81-104.

Kaplan, M., & de la Torre, J.. (2020). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500

Lord, F. M. (1977). A broad-range tailored test of verbal ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 95-100.

Lord, F. M. (1977). A Broad-Range Tailored Test of Verbal Ability . Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 95-100.

v01n1p095.pdf (402.88 KB)

Wainer, H.,, Lewis, C., Kaplan, B., & Braswell, J.. (1991). Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Cella, D., & Von Roenn, J.. (2003). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.

Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.

Moreno, K. E.,, & Segall, D. O.. (1992). CAT-ASVAB precision. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, 1, 22-26.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2008). CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3, 13-20.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.

Hutt, M. L. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., Weissman, A., & Cook, R. J.. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059

Ward, W. C. (1988). The College Board computerized placement tests: An application of computerized adaptive testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 271-282.

Steele, J. A., Binnie, C. A., & Cooper, W. A.. (1978). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.

McGlohen, M., & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavioral Research Methods , 40, 808-21. presented at the Aug.

Green, B. F. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080

Green, B. F. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.

Roper, B. L. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.

Shudong Wang,, Hong Jiao,, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J.. (2008). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592

Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.

Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1991). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x

Oswald, F. L., Shaw, A., & Farmer, W. L.. (2015). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517

Yao, L. (2013). Comparing the Performance of Five Multidimensional CAT Selection Procedures With Different Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0146621612455687

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D.. (2006). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Pages