%0 Journal Article %J Quality of Life Research %D 2009 %T Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning %A Haley, S. M. %A Ni, P. %A Jette, A. M. %A Tao, W. %A Moed, R. %A Meyers, D. %A Ludlow, L. H. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Disability Evaluation %K *Questionnaires %K *User-Computer Interface %K Adult %K Aged %K Cohort Studies %K Computer-Assisted Instruction %K Female %K Humans %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %X PURPOSE: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) item banks may need to be updated, but before new items can be added, they must be linked to the previous CAT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 41 pretest items prior to including them into an operational CAT. METHODS: We recruited 6,882 patients with spine, lower extremity, upper extremity, and nonorthopedic impairments who received outpatient rehabilitation in one of 147 clinics across 13 states of the USA. Forty-one new Daily Activity (DA) items were administered along with the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Daily Activity CAT (DA-CAT-1) in five separate waves. We compared the scoring consistency with the full item bank, test information function (TIF), person standard errors (SEs), and content range of the DA-CAT-1 to the new CAT (DA-CAT-2) with the pretest items by real data simulations. RESULTS: We retained 29 of the 41 pretest items. Scores from the DA-CAT-2 were more consistent (ICC = 0.90 versus 0.96) than DA-CAT-1 when compared with the full item bank. TIF and person SEs were improved for persons with higher levels of DA functioning, and ceiling effects were reduced from 16.1% to 6.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Item response theory and online calibration methods were valuable in improving the DA-CAT. %B Quality of Life Research %7 2009/03/17 %V 18 %P 461-71 %8 May %@ 0962-9343 (Print)0962-9343 (Linking) %G eng %M 19288222 %0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2008 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Siebens, H. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Tao, W. %A Coster, W. J. %A Ni, P. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVES: To measure participation outcomes with a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and compare CAT and traditional fixed-length surveys in terms of score agreement, respondent burden, discriminant validity, and responsiveness. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective cohort study of patients interviewed approximately 2 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and 3 months later. SETTING: Follow-up interviews conducted in patient's home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=94) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation domains of mobility, domestic life, and community, social, & civic life, measured using a CAT version of the Participation Measure for Postacute Care (PM-PAC-CAT) and a 53-item fixed-length survey (PM-PAC-53). RESULTS: The PM-PAC-CAT showed substantial agreement with PM-PAC-53 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, model 3,1, .71-.81). On average, the PM-PAC-CAT was completed in 42% of the time and with only 48% of the items as compared with the PM-PAC-53. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The PM-PAC-CAT had modest reductions in sensitivity and responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval as compared with the PM-PAC-53. CONCLUSIONS: Although continued evaluation is warranted, accurate estimates of participation status and responsiveness to change for group-level analyses can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a sizeable reduction in respondent burden. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2008/01/30 %V 89 %P 275-283 %8 Feb %@ 1532-821X (Electronic)0003-9993 (Linking) %G eng %M 18226651 %2 2666330 %0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2006 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Siebens, H. %A Coster, W. J. %A Tao, W. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Ni, P. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVE: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective 1-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. SETTING: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). RESULTS: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2006/08/01 %V 87 %P 1033-42 %8 Aug %@ 0003-9993 (Print) %G eng %M 16876547