%0 Journal Article %J Quality of Life Research %D 2009 %T Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning %A Haley, S. M. %A Ni, P. %A Jette, A. M. %A Tao, W. %A Moed, R. %A Meyers, D. %A Ludlow, L. H. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Disability Evaluation %K *Questionnaires %K *User-Computer Interface %K Adult %K Aged %K Cohort Studies %K Computer-Assisted Instruction %K Female %K Humans %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %X PURPOSE: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) item banks may need to be updated, but before new items can be added, they must be linked to the previous CAT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 41 pretest items prior to including them into an operational CAT. METHODS: We recruited 6,882 patients with spine, lower extremity, upper extremity, and nonorthopedic impairments who received outpatient rehabilitation in one of 147 clinics across 13 states of the USA. Forty-one new Daily Activity (DA) items were administered along with the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Daily Activity CAT (DA-CAT-1) in five separate waves. We compared the scoring consistency with the full item bank, test information function (TIF), person standard errors (SEs), and content range of the DA-CAT-1 to the new CAT (DA-CAT-2) with the pretest items by real data simulations. RESULTS: We retained 29 of the 41 pretest items. Scores from the DA-CAT-2 were more consistent (ICC = 0.90 versus 0.96) than DA-CAT-1 when compared with the full item bank. TIF and person SEs were improved for persons with higher levels of DA functioning, and ceiling effects were reduced from 16.1% to 6.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Item response theory and online calibration methods were valuable in improving the DA-CAT. %B Quality of Life Research %7 2009/03/17 %V 18 %P 461-71 %8 May %@ 0962-9343 (Print)0962-9343 (Linking) %G eng %M 19288222 %0 Journal Article %J Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %D 2008 %T Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes %A Haley, S. M. %A Gandek, B. %A Siebens, H. %A Black-Schaffer, R. M. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Tao, W. %A Coster, W. J. %A Ni, P. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Activities of Daily Living %K *Adaptation, Physiological %K *Computer Systems %K *Questionnaires %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Chi-Square Distribution %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Longitudinal Studies %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Patient Discharge %K Prospective Studies %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Subacute Care/*standards %X OBJECTIVES: To measure participation outcomes with a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and compare CAT and traditional fixed-length surveys in terms of score agreement, respondent burden, discriminant validity, and responsiveness. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective cohort study of patients interviewed approximately 2 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and 3 months later. SETTING: Follow-up interviews conducted in patient's home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=94) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation domains of mobility, domestic life, and community, social, & civic life, measured using a CAT version of the Participation Measure for Postacute Care (PM-PAC-CAT) and a 53-item fixed-length survey (PM-PAC-53). RESULTS: The PM-PAC-CAT showed substantial agreement with PM-PAC-53 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, model 3,1, .71-.81). On average, the PM-PAC-CAT was completed in 42% of the time and with only 48% of the items as compared with the PM-PAC-53. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The PM-PAC-CAT had modest reductions in sensitivity and responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval as compared with the PM-PAC-53. CONCLUSIONS: Although continued evaluation is warranted, accurate estimates of participation status and responsiveness to change for group-level analyses can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a sizeable reduction in respondent burden. %B Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation %7 2008/01/30 %V 89 %P 275-283 %8 Feb %@ 1532-821X (Electronic)0003-9993 (Linking) %G eng %M 18226651 %2 2666330 %0 Journal Article %J Journal of Clinical Epidemiology %D 2006 %T Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank %A Haley, S. M. %A Ni, P. %A Hambleton, R. K. %A Slavin, M. D. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Recovery of Function %K Activities of Daily Living %K Adolescent %K Adult %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Confidence Intervals %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Humans %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods %K Rehabilitation/*standards %K Reproducibility of Results %K Software %X BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Measuring physical functioning (PF) within and across postacute settings is critical for monitoring outcomes of rehabilitation; however, most current instruments lack sufficient breadth and feasibility for widespread use. Computer adaptive testing (CAT), in which item selection is tailored to the individual patient, holds promise for reducing response burden, yet maintaining measurement precision. We calibrated a PF item bank via item response theory (IRT), administered items with a post hoc CAT design, and determined whether CAT would improve accuracy and precision of score estimates over random item selection. METHODS: 1,041 adults were interviewed during postacute care rehabilitation episodes in either hospital or community settings. Responses for 124 PF items were calibrated using IRT methods to create a PF item bank. We examined the accuracy and precision of CAT-based scores compared to a random selection of items. RESULTS: CAT-based scores had higher correlations with the IRT-criterion scores, especially with short tests, and resulted in narrower confidence intervals than scores based on a random selection of items; gains, as expected, were especially large for low and high performing adults. CONCLUSION: The CAT design may have important precision and efficiency advantages for point-of-care functional assessment in rehabilitation practice settings. %B Journal of Clinical Epidemiology %7 2006/10/10 %V 59 %P 1174-82 %8 Nov %@ 0895-4356 (Print) %G eng %M 17027428 %0 Journal Article %J Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine %D 2005 %T Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment %A Jette, A. M. %A Haley, S. M. %K *Disability Evaluation %K Activities of Daily Living/classification %K Disabled Persons/classification/*rehabilitation %K Health Status Indicators %K Humans %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods/standards %K Recovery of Function %K Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural %K Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. %K Sensitivity and Specificity computerized adaptive testing %X In this article, we review the limitations of traditional rehabilitation functional outcome instruments currently in use within the rehabilitation field to assess Activity and Participation domains as defined by the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health. These include a narrow scope of functional outcomes, data incompatibility across instruments, and the precision vs feasibility dilemma. Following this, we illustrate how contemporary measurement techniques, such as item response theory methods combined with computer adaptive testing methodology, can be applied in rehabilitation to design functional outcome instruments that are comprehensive in scope, accurate, allow for compatibility across instruments, and are sensitive to clinically important change without sacrificing their feasibility. Finally, we present some of the pressing challenges that need to be overcome to provide effective dissemination and training assistance to ensure that current and future generations of rehabilitation professionals are familiar with and skilled in the application of contemporary outcomes measurement. %B Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine %V 37 %P 339-345 %G eng %M 16287664 %0 Journal Article %J Medical Care %D 2004 %T Activity outcome measurement for postacute care %A Haley, S. M. %A Coster, W. J. %A Andres, P. L. %A Ludlow, L. H. %A Ni, P. %A Bond, T. L. %A Sinclair, S. J. %A Jette, A. M. %K *Self Efficacy %K *Sickness Impact Profile %K Activities of Daily Living/*classification/psychology %K Adult %K Aftercare/*standards/statistics & numerical data %K Aged %K Boston %K Cognition/physiology %K Disability Evaluation %K Factor Analysis, Statistical %K Female %K Human %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Movement/physiology %K Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods/statistics & numerical data %K Psychometrics %K Questionnaires/standards %K Rehabilitation/*standards/statistics & numerical data %K Reproducibility of Results %K Sensitivity and Specificity %K Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. %K Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. %X BACKGROUND: Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of a broad range of postacute care services have been hindered by the lack of conceptually sound and comprehensive measures of outcomes. It is critical to determine a common underlying structure before employing current methods of item equating across outcome instruments for future item banking and computer-adaptive testing applications. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factor structure, reliability, and scale properties of items underlying the Activity domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for use in postacute care outcome measurement. METHODS: We developed a 41-item Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AM-PAC) that assessed an individual's execution of discrete daily tasks in his or her own environment across major content domains as defined by the ICF. We evaluated the reliability and discriminant validity of the prototype AM-PAC in 477 individuals in active rehabilitation programs across 4 rehabilitation settings using factor analyses, tests of item scaling, internal consistency reliability analyses, Rasch item response theory modeling, residual component analysis, and modified parallel analysis. RESULTS: Results from an initial exploratory factor analysis produced 3 distinct, interpretable factors that accounted for 72% of the variance: Applied Cognition (44%), Personal Care & Instrumental Activities (19%), and Physical & Movement Activities (9%); these 3 activity factors were verified by a confirmatory factor analysis. Scaling assumptions were met for each factor in the total sample and across diagnostic groups. Internal consistency reliability was high for the total sample (Cronbach alpha = 0.92 to 0.94), and for specific diagnostic groups (Cronbach alpha = 0.90 to 0.95). Rasch scaling, residual factor, differential item functioning, and modified parallel analyses supported the unidimensionality and goodness of fit of each unique activity domain. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-factor model of the AM-PAC can form the conceptual basis for common-item equating and computer-adaptive applications, leading to a comprehensive system of outcome instruments for postacute care settings. %B Medical Care %V 42 %P I49-161 %G eng %M 14707755