Wang, C., Chen, P., & Jiang, S..  (2020).  Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241

Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S..  (2019).  How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001

van der Linden, W. J., Jiang, B., Ren, H., Choi, S. W., & Diao, Q..  (2017).  Bayesian Perspectives on Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Yuyu, L., Chenglin, Z., & Jie, R..  (2017).  MHK-MST Design and the Related Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Veldkamp, B. P., Matteucci, M., & de Jong, M. G..  (2013).  Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J..  (2012).  Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L..  (2011).  Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J..  (2011).  Practitioner?s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Judd, W.  (2011).  Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al..  (2010).  Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33, 781-92. presented at the Jun 1.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Jette, A. M., Tao, W., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Ludlow, L. H..  (2009).  Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.

Jette, A. M., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., & Moed, R..  (2008).  Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842-52. presented at the Oct.

Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al..  (2008).  Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275-283. presented at the Feb.

Jhu, Y.-J.,, & Chen, S. - Y..  (2008).  Item exposure control in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 793-811.

Cook, K. F., Choi, S. W., Crane, P. K., Deyo, R. A., Johnson, K. L., & Amtmann, D..  (2008).  Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.

Qing Yi,, Jinming Zhang,, & Chang, H. - H..  (2008).  Severity of Organized Item Theft in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Simulation Study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 543-558. doi:10.1177/0146621607311336

Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S..  (2007).  Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.

Jette, A.,, Haley, S., Tao, W., Ni, P., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Zurek, M..  (2007).  Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.

Jodoin, M. G., Zenisky, A., & Hambleton, R. K..  (2006).  Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M..  (2006).  Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Haley, S., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M., & Jette, A..  (2006).  Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z..  (2006).  [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Jacobs-Cassuto, M. S.  (2005).  A comparison of adaptive mastery testing using testlets with the 3-parameter logistic model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M..  (2005).  Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Jun, Z., Dongming, O., Shuyuan, X., Haiqi, D., & Shuqing, Q..  (2005).  [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al..  (2004).  Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,.  (2004).  Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J..  (2004).  Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J..  (2004).  Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A..  (2004).  An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A..  (2004).  An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.

Jiao, H., & Lau, A. C..  (2003).  The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Jiao, H.  (2003).  The effects of model specification error in item response theory-based computerized classification test using sequential probability ratio test. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64, 478.

Jodoin, M.  (2003).  A multidimensional IRT mechanism for better understanding adaptive test behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Jodoin, M. G.  (2003).  Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.

Jodoin, M., Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K..  (2002).  Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Hambleton, R. K., Jodoin, M., & Zenisky, A. L..  (2002).  Impact of selected factors on the psychometric quality of credentialing examinations administered with a sequential testlet design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Jodoin, M. G.  (2002).  Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.

Jennings, J. A., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S..  (2001).  An investigation of the impact of items that exhibit mild DIF on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Linacre, J. M.  (2000).  Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U.  Kang, Jean, E., & Linacre, J. M., Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.

Tang, L., Jiang, H., & Chang, H. - H..  (1998).  A comparison of two methods of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H..  (1998).  Computer adaptive testing ? Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Berliner, N..  (1998).  Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I..  (1998).  The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bontempo, B., Julian, E. R., & Gorham, J. L..  (1997).  Assessing speededness in variable-length computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bennett, R. E., Steffen, M., Singley, M. K., Morley, M., & Jacquemin, D..  (1997).  Evaluating an automatically scorable, open-ended response type for measuring mathematical reasoning in computer-adaptive tests.

Jones, D. H.  (1997).  Mathematical programming approaches to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Johnson, S. H.  (1996).  Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.

Jacobson, R. L.  (1995).  Shortfall of questions curbs use of computerized graduate exam. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Jones-Dickson, C., Dorsey, D., Campbell-Warnock, J., & Fields, F..  (1993).  Moving in a new direction: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Nursing Management, 24, 80, 82. presented at the Jan.

Jacobson, R. L.  (1993).  New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.

Wise, S. L., Plake, S. S., Johnson, P. L., & Roos, S. L..  (1992).  A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P..  (1992).  The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Johnson, J. L., Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S..  (1991).  Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.

Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J..  (1980).  An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Johnson, M. J., & Weiss, D. J..  (1980).  Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Johnson, M. J.  (1979).  Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.

Jensema, C. J.  (1977).  Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 111-120.

Jensema, C. J.  (1977).  Bayesian Tailored Testing and the Influence of Item Bank Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 111-120.

Jensema, C. J.  (1976).  Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 82-89). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Jensema, C. J.  (1974).  An application of latent trait mental test theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 29-48.

Hansen, D. N., Johnson, B. F., Fagan, R. L., Tan, P., & Dick, W..  (1974).  Computer-based adaptive testing models for the Air Force technical training environment: Phase I: Development of a computerized measurement system for Air Force technical Training. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1-86 (MS No. 882). AFHRL Technical Report 74-48.

Jensema, C. J.  (1974).  The validity of Bayesian tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 757-756.

Jones, D., & Weinman, J..  (1973).  Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Jensema, C. J.  (1972).  An application of latent trait mental test theory to the Washington Pre-College Testing Battery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.