Title: Biblio RTF Export
Author: Biblio 7.x

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Moser, U..  (2019).  Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs Under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 121-146. doi:10.1111/jedm.12203

van Buuren, N., Straat, H., Eggen, T., & Fox, J. - P..  (2017).  Adaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning with a Network Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U..  (2017).  Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

van Boxel, M., & Eggen, T..  (2017).  The Implementation of Nationwide High Stakes Computerized (adaptive) Testing in the Netherlands. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Kn1PvgioUYaOJ5pykq-_XWnwDU15rRsf

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M..  (2017).  Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for  Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2016).  Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Classifying Examinees With Within-Dimensionality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 387-404. doi:10.1177/0146621616648931

van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2014).  Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723

Edwards, M. C., Flora, D. B., & Thissen, D..  (2012).  Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing With Uniform Item Exposure. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 118-141. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.660363

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al..  (2011).  Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L..  (2011).  Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B..  (2011).  Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Verschoor, A., Radtke, I., & Eggen, T..  (2011).  A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., Veldkamp, B. P., Schakel, L., & Smid, N. G..  (2010).  Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.

Eggen, T.  (2010).  Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T..  (2009).  Computerized classification testing in more than two categories by using stochastic curtailment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T..  (2009).  Constrained item selection using a stochastically curtailed SPRT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., et al..  (2009).  Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D..  (2009).  A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A..  (2008).  CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3, 13-20.

Elhan, A. H., Oztuna, D., Kutlay, S., Kucukdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A..  (2008).  An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.

Eggen, T.  (2007).  Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T.  (2007).  Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A..  (2007).  The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 49.

Egberink, I. J. L., & Veldkamp, B. P..  (2007).  The development of a computerized adaptive test for integrity. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C..  (2007).  Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D..  (2007).  Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Frey, A., & Ehmke, T..  (2007).  Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik [Hypothetical use of adaptive testing for the measurement of educational standards in mathematics] . . Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 169-184.

Veldkamp, B. P., Verschoor, A. J., & Eggen, T..  (2007).  A multiple objective test assembly approach for exposure control problems in computerized adaptive testing (No. 2007-1). Measurement and Research Department Reports. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A..  (2007).  A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,,  5(8).

Chang, C. - H., Boni-Saenz, A. A., Durazo-Arvizu, R. A., DesHarnais, S., Lau, D. T., & Emanuel, L. L..  (2007).  A system for interactive assessment and management in palliative care. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 33, 745-55.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A..  (2006).  Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J..  (2006).  Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J..  (2006).  Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Economides, A. A.  (2005).  Adaptive orientation methods in computer adaptive testing. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 1290-1295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Economides, A. A.  (2005).  Computer adaptive testing quality requirements. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 288-295, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al..  (2005).  Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A..  (2005).  The development of the adaptive item language assessment (AILA) for mixed-ability students. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 643-650, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A..  (2005).  An implemented theoretical framework for a common European foreign language adaptive assessment. In . Proceedings ICODL 2005, 3rd ternational Conference on Open and Distance Learning 'Applications of Pedagogy and Technology',339-350,Greek Open University, Patra, Greece.

Economides, A. A.  (2005).  Personalized feedback in CAT. In . WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, Issue 3, Volume 2,174-181, July 2005.

Lamboudis, D., & Economides, A. A..  (2004).  Adaptive exploration of user knowledge in computer based testing. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 3 (1), 322-327.

Eggen, T.  (2004).  Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Citogroep.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J..  (2004).  Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A..  (2004).  State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J..  (2004).  A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Lamboudis, D., Economides, A. A., & Papastergiou, A..  (2003).  Adaptive exploration of assessment results under uncertainty. In . Proceedings 3rd IEEE ternational Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT '03, 460-461, 2003.

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J. J..  (2003).  The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A..  (2003).  Cognitive CAT in foreign language assessment. In Proceedings 11th International PEG Conference. Powerful ICT Tools for Learning and Teaching, PEG '03, CD-ROM, 2003.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A..  (2003).  Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. Manchester UK.

Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., Dunlap, I., & et. al.,.  (2003).  A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research,  12,  953-961.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F..  (2002).  Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F..  (2002).  Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

Stocking, M., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., & Eignor, D. R..  (2002).  An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).

Embretson, S. E.  (2002).  Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P.  Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E..  (2001).  Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Stocking, M. L., Steffen, M., & Eignor, D. R..  (2001).  A method for building a realistic model of test taker behavior for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 01-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eggen, T.  (2001).  Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

Way, W. D., Gawlick, L. A., & Eignor, D. R..  (2001).  Scoring alternatives for incomplete computerized adaptive tests (Research Report 01-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wainer, H.,, & Eignor, D. R..  (2000).  Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N., Eignor, D. R., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R., et al..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M..  (2000).  Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.

Rijn, P. W. van,, Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F..  (2000).  A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Wise, S. L., Finney, S. J.,, Enders, C. K., Freeman, S. A., & Severance, D. D..  (1999).  Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 185-198.

Embretson, S. E.  (1999).  Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models. Psychometrika, 64, 407-433.

Eggen, T.  (1999).  Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 249-261.

Straetmans, G. J. J. M., & Eggen, T..  (1998).  Computerized adaptive testing: What it is and how it works. Educational Technology, 38, 45-52.

Eggen, T.  (1998).  Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Measurement and Research Department Report, 98-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I..  (1998).  The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wise, S. L., Freeman, S. A., Finney, S. J., Enders, C. K., & Severance, D. D..  (1997).  The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M..  (1996).  Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Shermis, M. D., & et. al.,.  (1996).  Computerized adaptive testing for reading assessment and diagnostic assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 18-20.

Eignor, D. R., & Schaffer, G. A..  (1995).  Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Diones, R., & Everson, H..  (1994).  Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E..  (1994).  Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Eignor, D. R., Folk, V.G.,, Li, M. - Y., & Stocking, M. L..  (1994).  Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M..  (1993).  Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M..  (1993).  Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R.  (1993).  Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Engdahl, B.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Embretson, S. E.  (1992).  Computerized adaptive testing: Its potential substantive contribution to psychological research and assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 129-133.

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,.  (1989).  Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Kingsbury, G. G., & et. al.,.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.

Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S..  (1978).  Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Hambleton, R. K., & Eignor, D. R..  (1977).  Adaptive Testing Applied to Hierarchically Structured Objectives-Based Programs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

English, R. A., Reckase, M. D., & Patience, W. M..  (1977).  Application of tailored testing to achievement measurement. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 158-161.

Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S..  (1977).  Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota.

Elwood, D. L., & Griffin, H. R..  (1972).  Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.

Elwood, D. L.  (1969).  Automation of psychological testing. American Psychologist, 24, 287-289.