TY - JOUR T1 - IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary JF - Quality of Life Research Y1 - 2007 A1 - Cook, K. F. A1 - Teal, C. R. A1 - Bjorner, J. B. A1 - Cella, D. A1 - Chang, C-H. A1 - Crane, P. K. A1 - Gibbons, L. E. A1 - Hays, R. D. A1 - McHorney, C. A. A1 - Ocepek-Welikson, K. A1 - Raczek, A. E. A1 - Teresi, J. A. A1 - Reeve, B. B. KW - *Data Interpretation, Statistical KW - *Health Status KW - *Quality of Life KW - *Questionnaires KW - *Software KW - Female KW - HIV Infections/psychology KW - Humans KW - Male KW - Neoplasms/psychology KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods KW - Psychometrics KW - Stress, Psychological AB - BACKGROUND: In June 2004, the National Cancer Institute and the Drug Information Association co-sponsored the conference, "Improving the Measurement of Health Outcomes through the Applications of Item Response Theory (IRT) Modeling: Exploration of Item Banks and Computer-Adaptive Assessment." A component of the conference was presentation of a psychometric and content analysis of a secondary dataset. OBJECTIVES: A thorough psychometric and content analysis was conducted of two primary domains within a cancer health-related quality of life (HRQOL) dataset. RESEARCH DESIGN: HRQOL scales were evaluated using factor analysis for categorical data, IRT modeling, and differential item functioning analyses. In addition, computerized adaptive administration of HRQOL item banks was simulated, and various IRT models were applied and compared. SUBJECTS: The original data were collected as part of the NCI-funded Quality of Life Evaluation in Oncology (Q-Score) Project. A total of 1,714 patients with cancer or HIV/AIDS were recruited from 5 clinical sites. MEASURES: Items from 4 HRQOL instruments were evaluated: Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Four lessons learned from the project are discussed: the importance of good developmental item banks, the ambiguity of model fit results, the limits of our knowledge regarding the practical implications of model misfit, and the importance in the measurement of HRQOL of construct definition. With respect to these lessons, areas for future research are suggested. The feasibility of developing item banks for broad definitions of health is discussed. VL - 16 SN - 0962-9343 (Print) N1 - Cook, Karon FTeal, Cayla RBjorner, Jakob BCella, DavidChang, Chih-HungCrane, Paul KGibbons, Laura EHays, Ron DMcHorney, Colleen AOcepek-Welikson, KatjaRaczek, Anastasia ETeresi, Jeanne AReeve, Bryce B1U01AR52171-01/AR/United States NIAMSR01 (CA60068)/CA/United States NCIY1-PC-3028-01/PC/United States NCIResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralNetherlandsQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitationQual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:121-32. Epub 2007 Mar 10. ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) JF - Medical Care Y1 - 2007 A1 - Reeve, B. B. A1 - Hays, R. D. A1 - Bjorner, J. B. A1 - Cook, K. F. A1 - Crane, P. K. A1 - Teresi, J. A. A1 - Thissen, D. A1 - Revicki, D. A. A1 - Weiss, D. J. A1 - Hambleton, R. K. A1 - Liu, H. A1 - Gershon, R. C. A1 - Reise, S. P. A1 - Lai, J. S. A1 - Cella, D. KW - *Health Status KW - *Information Systems KW - *Quality of Life KW - *Self Disclosure KW - Adolescent KW - Adult KW - Aged KW - Calibration KW - Databases as Topic KW - Evaluation Studies as Topic KW - Female KW - Humans KW - Male KW - Middle Aged KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods KW - Psychometrics KW - Questionnaires/standards KW - United States AB - BACKGROUND: The construction and evaluation of item banks to measure unidimensional constructs of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a fundamental objective of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project. OBJECTIVES: Item banks will be used as the foundation for developing short-form instruments and enabling computerized adaptive testing. The PROMIS Steering Committee selected 5 HRQOL domains for initial focus: physical functioning, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social role participation. This report provides an overview of the methods used in the PROMIS item analyses and proposed calibration of item banks. ANALYSES: Analyses include evaluation of data quality (eg, logic and range checking, spread of response distribution within an item), descriptive statistics (eg, frequencies, means), item response theory model assumptions (unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity), model fit, differential item functioning, and item calibration for banking. RECOMMENDATIONS: Summarized are key analytic issues; recommendations are provided for future evaluations of item banks in HRQOL assessment. VL - 45 SN - 0025-7079 (Print) N1 - Reeve, Bryce BHays, Ron DBjorner, Jakob BCook, Karon FCrane, Paul KTeresi, Jeanne AThissen, DavidRevicki, Dennis AWeiss, David JHambleton, Ronald KLiu, HonghuGershon, RichardReise, Steven PLai, Jin-sheiCella, DavidPROMIS Cooperative GroupAG015815/AG/United States NIAResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesMedical careMed Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-31. ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications JF - Medical Care Y1 - 2006 A1 - Teresi, J. A. KW - *Cross-Cultural Comparison KW - Data Interpretation, Statistical KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical KW - Guidelines as Topic KW - Humans KW - Models, Statistical KW - Psychometrics/*methods KW - Statistics as Topic/*methods KW - Statistics, Nonparametric AB - BACKGROUND: Reviewed in this article are issues relating to the study of invariance and differential item functioning (DIF). The aim of factor analyses and DIF, in the context of invariance testing, is the examination of group differences in item response conditional on an estimate of disability. Discussed are parameters and statistics that are not invariant and cannot be compared validly in crosscultural studies with varying distributions of disability in contrast to those that can be compared (if the model assumptions are met) because they are produced by models such as linear and nonlinear regression. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this overview is to provide an integrated approach to the quantitative methods used in this special issue to examine measurement equivalence. The methods include classical test theory (CTT), factor analytic, and parametric and nonparametric approaches to DIF detection. Also included in the quantitative section is a discussion of item banking and computerized adaptive testing (CAT). METHODS: Factorial invariance and the articles discussing this topic are introduced. A brief overview of the DIF methods presented in the quantitative section of the special issue is provided together with a discussion of ways in which DIF analyses and examination of invariance using factor models may be complementary. CONCLUSIONS: Although factor analytic and DIF detection methods share features, they provide unique information and can be viewed as complementary in informing about measurement equivalence. VL - 44 SN - 0025-7079 (Print)0025-7079 (Linking) N1 - Teresi, Jeanne AAG15294/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United StatesResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReviewUnited StatesMedical careMed Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. ER -